Home
Posted By: J23 Lilja #2? - 04/02/20
So, I am trying to blueprint a new rifle I think I want to have built, and I have done some searching, and I'm trying to get a 'feel' for the weight and balance of a Lilja #2 @ 26" on a 700 long action.

...or #3 fluted?

Is that similar to a Remington sporter weight, or magnum contour?

I have a donor 700 30-06 ADL action, and I've been wanting a 22-6mm (224 TTH) 8-twist 3-groove at 26" to max out the speed.

It was gonna be used as a walking crow, coyote and groundhog rifle. I am not big on barrel weight out front, I just want something balanced between the hands, 'sporter' heavy but not ultralight or Sendero sized. Maybe 7.5-8# with the scope?





Posted By: ShortMagFan Re: Lilja #2? - 04/02/20
I recently had a fast twist 22-250 built. Barrel was a Hawk Hill profiled to Lilja #2 at 22”. It’s perfect for me. Bare rifle in an edge stock weights 6lbs which is what I was looking for. It’s a pretty light contour but with that bore diameter being only .224 it isn’t too light
Posted By: Oregonmuley Re: Lilja #2? - 04/02/20
I have a .243 built with a Lilja #3 fluted and finished @ 23". The #3 is pretty close to a Remington mag profile I would say. Balance on my .243 is about perfect, its in a Classic Edge stock and with a Leupold scope I was at 7 lbs 6 ozs or so, now with a NXS 2.5-10x42 I'm at 8 lbs 3ozs.
Posted By: J23 Re: Lilja #2? - 04/02/20
Thanks for the input guys.

Sounds like a #2 or perhaps even a fluted #3. I have to keep in mind my barrel will be a few inches longer.
Posted By: Hammerdown Re: Lilja #2? - 04/03/20
I'm not sure you can flute a .308 bore in a # 3 Lilja. I was talking with Dan Lilja about 5 week ago on this same subject. He could do a 3 if I went with a smaller caliber than .308
Just FYI

I have a 30-06 # 2 with a 3 grove from Lilja it works great.
Posted By: MallardAddict Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
I had a 280ai with a 26” #2 in a McMillan Edge and it weighed 7lbs even. I wouldn’t call it a heavy sporter. I’m a fan of the Bartlein 3b for a mid sized contour.
Posted By: Reloder28 Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
My 280 AI sports a #1 Lilja. Wouldn’t exactly call it a pencil barrel. But, the gun is 6.14 scoped & ready to hunt.
Posted By: murkydismal Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
I read somewhere, can't remember where right now, that a Lilja #1 falls between the Rem Mountain Rifle contour and the Remington standard caliber contour, if that helps any.

I have done two Lilja #2's, a 270 WCF and 308, both 22". The 308 is s/a Rem 700 BDL in McM Edge w/13.75" LOP and weighs 7 lb. 5 oz. w/4 rounds ammo, sling, Weaver bases/rings and Leupold FXII 4x. Both shoot lights out and probably wouldn't want either much lighter in those bore diameters.

Am considering a #1 in a smaller caliber though, probably a 6mm CM or plain jane 243, possibly a 25-06.

Please, if you do go #2, let us (24HC) know how the longer barrel works out for balance etc.

Just FWIW.
Posted By: Offshoreman Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
J23,

I tried posting a contour chart here but the damn file size restriction makes unreadable - I'll PM you.
Posted By: handwerk Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
I have a Lilja #2 on my M70 300 H&H, I think it's a great mid-weight barrel in that setup and it's shot very well. It dropped into my Echols Legend stock perfectly.
Posted By: J23 Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
Wow guys, thanks for all of the very helpful responses! Weight is important, but trying to predict the balance seems to be a bit harder. I'd hate to get a rifle home from the 'smith and dislike it after all the time and money invested. More than anything, I'm just trying to avoid a barrel heavy situation.

Originally Posted by MallardAddict
I had a 280ai with a 26” #2 in a McMillan Edge and it weighed 7lbs even. I wouldn’t call it a heavy sporter. I’m a fan of the Bartlein 3b for a mid sized contour.


Your rifle seems to be the closest to the one I'm planning to have built. Was your #2 a Lilja? I'm finding that every manufacturers #2 is a bit different. The weight seems to be about spot on. I'm sure the .224" bore will add a little weight, but I cant see it being too significant. Hows the balance?

I was going to go with a McMillan, but not sure about the Edge fill yet. Maybe a Remington Classic? That will be the next decision.
Posted By: 10gaugemag Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
Originally Posted by J23
So, I am trying to blueprint a new rifle I think I want to have built, and I have done some searching, and I'm trying to get a 'feel' for the weight and balance of a Lilja #2 @ 26" on a 700 long action.

...or #3 fluted?

Is that similar to a Remington sporter weight, or magnum contour?

I have a donor 700 30-06 ADL action, and I've been wanting a 22-6mm (224 TTH) 8-twist 3-groove at 26" to max out the speed.

It was gonna be used as a walking crow, coyote and groundhog rifle. I am not big on barrel weight out front, I just want something balanced between the hands, 'sporter' heavy but not ultralight or Sendero sized. Maybe 7.5-8# with the scope?






Other than the critters mentioned that sounds like a perfect set up for a 6mm Remmy or a 25-06.

Tagged to see where this goes.

Have a BDL 270 I may want to do something with.
Posted By: jdunham Re: Lilja #2? - 04/04/20
Lilja's contours are on the lighter side when compared to most other manufacturers. I think the #2 Lilja will be perfect for what you are doing with a 26" barrel. I had one on a rifle I no longer own. Nice and light barrel contour without being whippy. I regret selling it.
Posted By: Clarkm Re: Lilja #2? - 04/05/20
I have built (4) #3 Liljas in 257 or 7mm and they shoot so much better than I can, I should try going thinner in the barrel.
Posted By: MallardAddict Re: Lilja #2? - 04/05/20
Originally Posted by MallardAddict
I had a 280ai with a 26” #2 in a McMillan Edge and it weighed 7lbs even. I wouldn’t call it a heavy sporter. I’m a fan of the Bartlein 3b for a mid sized contour.


Your rifle seems to be the closest to the one I'm planning to have built. Was your #2 a Lilja? I'm finding that every manufacturers #2 is a bit different. The weight seems to be about spot on. I'm sure the .224" bore will add a little weight, but I cant see it being too significant. Hows the balance?

I was going to go with a McMillan, but not sure about the Edge fill yet. Maybe a Remington Classic? That will be the next decision.
[/quote]

Pacnor #2 on mine. I was happy with it but have another slightly heavier 280ai that I kept as I have other flyweights in the safe.

Attached picture FCCE64F8-4C3E-4DAD-8D4F-1F068F1A6C25.jpeg
© 24hourcampfire