I have a chance to buy a new, 1894 Limited Edition, 1 of 500, 45 Colt. It's been brought to my attention that since Remington is now making the 1894 in Ilion, NY, they might have an issue with large/loose chambers, causing blow-by with lighter loads. Any truth to this and any way to check to see if the chamber is loose?


Alan

Wouldn’t surprise me a bit. I’ve seen it on Marlins chambered for various straight wall cases of various vintages dating back to the 70’s.

I had a JM stamped 1894 in 45 Colt that just wouldn't shoot worth a darn. When I got into cast bullets I found out a .458" diameter bullet could easily chamber. Accuracy improved but I don't want to have revolver ammo and separate rifle ammo so I had the rifle rebarreled. I don't know about the newer Remington made rifles.

I don't remember hearing a logical explanation, but it seems like the old .45 is often plagued with arms with over sized chambers, cylinder throats that are too small, bore diameters that vary, etc.

I haven't found this with the 94 Marlin, but every 94 Winchester in 45 I have owned has had a sloppy chamber. As you read these articles, make sure the 94 they are referring to is the Marlin.

It happens. I have a Marlin 36 - A in .32 Winchester Special. It shoots just fine, but blows the shoulder about 0.060" past nominal. If the cartridge didn't head space on the rim it wouldn't even fire. I full length resize the cases to fit the chamber and all is working.