Home
Posted By: Hawken 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/07/09
My local gunshop is asking 360 for it. It's in great shape. do you think it's worth it?
Posted By: model70man Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/07/09
Buy it first thing this morning!
Posted By: splattermatic Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/07/09
do it. great rifle !
Posted By: model70man Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/08/09
Did you buy it?
Posted By: Mossyoak1957 Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/08/09
Buy it......I just bought this old early 50's SC in 35 Rem. last week...it had no butt plate on,the stock was a mess,the sling swivel was in the spot where the bullseye should be.I had an extra bullseye so I re-did that,put the sling swivel in the correct spot and also had an extra buttplate,re-did that also.Then re-finished the wood.
Took it to the range this morning and took 2 shots with it at 50 yards at a piece of blue masking tape 2in x 2in and hit it both times.

It's now my new back up Marlin smile

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Here is my main Marlin shooter a SC Deluxe in 35 Rem.
[Linked Image]
Posted By: Jericho Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/08/09
The next 336SC in 35 that I find is coming home with
me, would prefer one already drilled and tapped.
Posted By: Mossyoak1957 Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/09/09
Originally Posted by Jericho
The next 336SC in 35 that I find is coming home with
me, would prefer one already drilled and tapped.


I'm pretty sure Marlin started tapping them in 1956
Posted By: model70man Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/09/09
Nice rifles. You did a good job. Don't see too many Deluxe SCs around here either. I like them both.
Posted By: Hawken Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/10/09
I didn't buy it yet. I've found a Marlin 336 SDT at a different shop, and now I'm really torn. The SDT is 1 of 500 and the price reflects this at $799. But what a sweet little rifle.
Posted By: model70man Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/10/09
I would still take the SC in .35 you talked about. But you are the one who really knows what you want but it's like being torn between a blonde and a redhead.
Posted By: Mossyoak1957 Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/10/09
Originally Posted by model70man
I would still take the SC in .35 you talked about. But you are the one who really knows what you want but it's like being torn between a blonde and a redhead.


OH! Stay away from the redheads they will rip your eyes out! Been down that road... eek
Posted By: Henry McCann Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/13/09
I would take the SC in .35 also...But I love the 2/3's magazine look on the SC's and the early A's.

I passed one up 6 or 7 years ago for $300 and I still regret it. There were cosmetic issues, but the action and bore were good!
Posted By: model70man Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/13/09
Originally Posted by Henry McCann
I would take the SC in .35 also...But I love the 2/3's magazine look on the SC's and the early A's.

I passed one up 6 or 7 years ago for $3.00 and I still regret it. There were cosmetic issues, but the action and bore were good!


Hello. I hope the Model 71 I bought from you will speak again this year. One shot, no tracking. I still have the 64 also.

Best wishes for the hunting season and the holidays...Bill.
Posted By: dubePA Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/13/09
$360 would be a bit high in my area of PA, but since they ain't making any more of 'em and they really are neat little carbines...go for it. Everyone should own at least one SC in 35 Rem or 32 Win. Spl., maybe two? ;O)
Posted By: Hawken Re: 1952 336SC in .35 - 11/14/09
There was a Wrench thrown into the works; Someone traded in a brunette.in the form of a rifle I've always Wanted, a Ruger M44 Deerfield from 1962. I'm going there today to buy it. $599 and it's in absolutly perfect shape.
© 24hourcampfire