PN 200349. Looks can be deceiving but this scope looks good. Reticle seems much more appropriate for the field than other “tacticals ” Burris has. Some of which overwhelm my simple mind. Mathematical fluency is not my strong point when deciding where and what to hold on a critter nearing launch. Side parallax knob, not too heavy. Seems quite handy. And a metric ton of them for sale.

Can you confirm that its a full reticle that extends to the edge of the glass? Does it have the weird tree thing too?


This reticle flat out sucks balls... Thanks buddy..

Just put one on my .22 Hornet to replace an old 3-9 that ran out of diopter adjustment. This one has been on a bunch of stuff. Gets hard to get behind at 12x and over, but that’s typical. Otherwise, it’s a nice scope, and I like having the side focus. The reticle isn’t my favorite, but is usable. IfI find something else more suitable, perhaps I’ll swap it out, perhaps not.

Reticle is a plain jane ballistic plex just like on the 3-9x40 Fullfield II. I was concerned about that when ordering as well after reading of folks getting the microplex instead of a full wall to wall reticle. And another thing is the picture of the scope on it’s box. Rifle on the box does not have a side parallax adjustment. But no worries. The reticle is like you like it and there is indeed a side adjustment parallax knob.

Sounds like a good scope. Youll have to let us know how you like it. The price sure is reasonable

Got one of the same , plain old fashion burris ballistic plex. 4.5-14 E1 , going on a "custom" ceracoat AR she designed (what parts what colors she wanted) in 6.5 grendel. Have the same place in an older fullfield II , like it.
The other "unattached tree plex " I have in a 6.5-20 E1 it's fun for shooting games and targets , but too small thin for hunting in any kind of low light conditions.