Home
Posted By: gophergunner 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
I apologize, as I'm pretty sure this has been asked before. What's the difference between ammo labeled .223 and 5.56 Nato? Is it safe to run .223 through an AR platform that's chambered for 5.56? Where does the Wylde offering fall into this mess?

Thanks guys.
Posted By: keith_dunlap Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.56 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56

here's a better explanation:

http://www.americanweaponscomponent...aliber-confusion-223-wylde-vs-5-56-nato/

{ Edited to correct typo}
Posted By: Crockettnj Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Rumor mill at the local gun shop ( I put very little faith in their knowledge. Almost none, really) is that the Wylde chamber wont handle (cheaper) steel 5.56 ammo well.

Any truth?

Posted By: gophergunner Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by Crockettnj
Rumor mill at the local gun shop ( I put very little faith in their knowledge. Almost none, really) is that the Wylde chamber wont handle (cheaper) steel 5.56 ammo well.

Any truth?

That brings up an other good point. I've been told to not shoot steel cased ammo. Is this an accurate statement for my PSA Ar-15 with a 1 in 7 twist barrel? Eliminates the cheap ammo for plinking purposes.
Posted By: antelope_sniper Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Steel works well in 7.62x39 because it's a highly tapered cartridge. The .223/ 5.56 by comparison is straight sides so steel is less prone to run well in any of these chambers.

I've had issues with steel even in factory 5.56 chambers.

I don't run it in any of my AR series rifles regardless of chamber.
Posted By: FAIR_CHASE Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by keith_dunlap
223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.46 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56

here's a better explanation:

http://www.americanweaponscomponent...aliber-confusion-223-wylde-vs-5-56-nato/


5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.
Posted By: gophergunner Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Steel works well in 7.62x39 because it's a highly tapered cartridge. The .223/ 5.56 by comparison is straight sides so steel is less prone to run well in any of these chambers.

I've had issues with steel even in factory 5.56 chambers.

I don't run it in any of my AR series rifles regardless of chamber.
I was just down stairs putting my stuff away from a range trip today. I've got a little over 100 rounds of steel cased stuff. Guess I won't shoot that any more. Thanks for the advice.
Posted By: NVhntr Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
100 rounds won"t make a big difference.

Shoot it up but don"t buy anymore. Buy brass cased and reload.
Posted By: antelope_sniper Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
Originally Posted by keith_dunlap
223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.46 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56

here's a better explanation:

http://www.americanweaponscomponent...aliber-confusion-223-wylde-vs-5-56-nato/


5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.


5.56 loads are not 100% ok in .223 chambers. In a bolt gun, but factory loads, I generally don't worry about it, since modern bolts handle 65k psi just fine. But in the AR I have loads that are fine in 5.56 chambers that need to be backed of a full grain or they blow primers in a .223 chamber.

There is a non-trivial difference between the two, and you need to pay attention to it.
Posted By: Direct_Drive Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
Originally Posted by keith_dunlap
223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.56 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56

here's a better explanation:

http://www.americanweaponscomponent...aliber-confusion-223-wylde-vs-5-56-nato/


5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.

5.56 is typically loaded hotter than civilian .223
Never heard of a kaboom, but it is universally considered unsafe to run 5.56 in the tighter .223 chamber.

Although safe to use .223 ammo in a 5.56 chamber, it sometimes is too weak to run an AR that is tuned for 5.56.


This is correct (from above):

223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.56 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56
Posted By: NVhntr Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.


And there is some of that crap right there.
Posted By: FAIR_CHASE Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
Originally Posted by keith_dunlap
223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.46 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56

here's a better explanation:

http://www.americanweaponscomponent...aliber-confusion-223-wylde-vs-5-56-nato/


5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.


5.56 loads are not 100% ok in .223 chambers. In a bolt gun, but factory loads, I generally don't worry about it, since modern bolts handle 65k psi just fine. But in the AR I have loads that are fine in 5.56 chambers that need to be backed of a full grain or they blow primers in a .223 chamber.

There is a non-trivial difference between the two, and you need to pay attention to it.


Wrong.
Posted By: FAIR_CHASE Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by Direct_Drive
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
Originally Posted by keith_dunlap
223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.56 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56

here's a better explanation:

http://www.americanweaponscomponent...aliber-confusion-223-wylde-vs-5-56-nato/


5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.

5.56 is typically loaded hotter than civilian .223
Never heard of a kaboom, but it is universally considered unsafe to run 5.56 in the tighter .223 chamber.

Although safe to use .223 ammo in a 5.56 chamber, it sometimes is too weak to run an AR that is tuned for 5.56.


This is correct (from above):

223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.56 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56


Wrong again.
Posted By: FAIR_CHASE Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.


And there is some of that crap right there.


Still wrong.
Posted By: antelope_sniper Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by FAIR_CHASE
Originally Posted by keith_dunlap
223 in a 5.56 marked barrel = Okay
5.46 in a 223 marked barrel = No
Wylde barrel = Good for 223 & 5.56

here's a better explanation:

http://www.americanweaponscomponent...aliber-confusion-223-wylde-vs-5-56-nato/


5.46 in a 223 marked barrel probably is not okay but 5.56 in a 223 barrel is 100% OKAY. Same wrong crap gets recirculated via the wonderful web over and over.


5.56 loads are not 100% ok in .223 chambers. In a bolt gun, but factory loads, I generally don't worry about it, since modern bolts handle 65k psi just fine. But in the AR I have loads that are fine in 5.56 chambers that need to be backed of a full grain or they blow primers in a .223 chamber.

There is a non-trivial difference between the two, and you need to pay attention to it.


Wrong.


Really?

And exactly when did you shoot my rifles and handloads?
Posted By: TWR Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/26/16
Most factory chambers are large enough that it ain't gonna matter but order a match 223 chamber and see if you don't have to back off.
Posted By: wareagle700 Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Originally Posted by TWR
Most factory chambers are large enough that it ain't gonna matter but order a match 223 chamber and see if you don't have to back off.


Yep. Not going to create a life or death situation but shoot a case of Mk262 in a true match 223 chamber and see how far you get before malfunctions and broken parts.
Posted By: gophergunner Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Thanks for the good info here guys. I'm new to the world of the AR so this is all good stuff to know. Once again the men at the 'Fire have come through. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Posted By: deflave Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Your AR will more than likely gobble up everything.

Including steel.



Travis
Posted By: BarryC Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
I hate to break it to you all, but when it comes to a .223 marked barrel, you can't go by the barrel marking.

I have a Mark X Mini Mauser factory marked ".223 Rem" but it is a NATO chamber. I understand that Olympic or some other AR maker did the same thing on some rifles.
Posted By: djones Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
unbelievable how something so simple can get so derailed. at least everyone agrees that neither a 223, 546 nor a 556 will kill a pig.

Posted By: Direct_Drive Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Originally Posted by BarryC
I hate to break it to you all, but when it comes to a .223 marked barrel, you can't go by the barrel marking.

I have a Mark X Mini Mauser factory marked ".223 Rem" but it is a NATO chamber. I understand that Olympic or some other AR maker did the same thing on some rifles.

Even some Colt rifles were marked that way.
In some European countries civilians are not allowed to possess military ammo.
That's probably why that Mini was marked that way.
Posted By: Direct_Drive Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
[Linked Image]



Is it no coincidence that in the native tongue of the north, fairchase means kaboom ?



smile
Posted By: deerstalker Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
my barrel is marked 5.56 nato.
works fine with all brass cased ammo.
jams with steel cased ammo with the case 2/3 chambered. and i mean jammed. takes a half hour to remove.
parts ain't parts. and chambers are not all the same even when marked alike.
ymmv
Posted By: TWR Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
And Ned Christiansen has a 5.56 throat reamer that will clean up lots of 5.56 marked chambers that aren't.
Posted By: FAIR_CHASE Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Originally Posted by Direct_Drive
[Linked Image]



Is it no coincidence that in the native tongue of the north, fairchase means kaboom ?



smile


Wrong yet again. Nasty women. Loser. Trade mark.
Posted By: TWR Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Yep, you're wrong again
http://ar15barrels.com/data/223vs556.pdf
There is a difference
Posted By: akpls Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Originally Posted by Crockettnj
Rumor mill at the local gun shop ( I put very little faith in their knowledge. Almost none, really) is that the Wylde chamber wont handle (cheaper) steel 5.56 ammo well.

Any truth?
My Wylde does not like steel case ammo one bit. It jams up when trying to chamber a round. On the other hand, my 223/556 Bushmaster sucks steel case up and spits it out all day long.
Posted By: FAIR_CHASE Re: 5.56/.223 - 10/27/16
Originally Posted by TWR
Yep, you're wrong again
http://ar15barrels.com/data/223vs556.pdf
There is a difference


Sure there is a numbers difference between 223 and 5.56 but it doesn't make any real life difference. Completely safe to shoot factory 5.56 in a factory 223 marked barrel. With 10s of thousands of 5.56 and 223 ARs in the USA and with millions of rounds of both ammo flavors flowing freely it is amazing there are not daily kabooms and equally impressive everyone knows not to shoot 5.56 in a 223 chamber.

Any chance you can find some "compelling" evidence on the www that the moon landing was faked, UFOs are real, the govt killed Kennedy, ........?
© 24hourcampfire