Caution using Quickload for Lil Gun - 07/12/09
The burn rate listed in QL for Lil Gun is too low when used with loading densities of less than about 90%. I have found 0.9630 to work well (instead of the default 0.8550) from 40% to 85% load density.
This is because the burn rate of LG starts dropping as the case gets full. A plot of velocity vs. grains is nearly linear up to about 85% after which it rolls over and flattens out. As loads become compressed velocities will begin to drop. My guess is that the LG burn rate test was done near 100% load density.
My observations are based on chronograph readings of 22 Hornet, 218 Bee, 25-20, 32-20, 38 Spec and 45 Colt.
I bring this up because it can create a dangerous, or at least surprising load. For example, an esteemed handloader on another board has his own website where he lists some heavy LG loads for 218 Bee in a Contender. The loads he lists are way over those recommended by Hodgdon (the manufacturer). When I worked up 218 Bee loads for my Winch Mo 43, I found that I could not get anywhere near the other handloaders load without experiencing high pressure signs such as pierced primers and case/head separation. The reason for our differences is that he was using full case loads, and I was working up from much lower levels (in accordance with Hodgdons advice).
So be careful when using LG at less than 90% load density, as it will be faster than QL predicts and others may report. IMO, it is perfectly safe at less than 90%, if you make the necessary QL BR corrections and heed the mfr's guidance.
This is because the burn rate of LG starts dropping as the case gets full. A plot of velocity vs. grains is nearly linear up to about 85% after which it rolls over and flattens out. As loads become compressed velocities will begin to drop. My guess is that the LG burn rate test was done near 100% load density.
My observations are based on chronograph readings of 22 Hornet, 218 Bee, 25-20, 32-20, 38 Spec and 45 Colt.
I bring this up because it can create a dangerous, or at least surprising load. For example, an esteemed handloader on another board has his own website where he lists some heavy LG loads for 218 Bee in a Contender. The loads he lists are way over those recommended by Hodgdon (the manufacturer). When I worked up 218 Bee loads for my Winch Mo 43, I found that I could not get anywhere near the other handloaders load without experiencing high pressure signs such as pierced primers and case/head separation. The reason for our differences is that he was using full case loads, and I was working up from much lower levels (in accordance with Hodgdons advice).
So be careful when using LG at less than 90% load density, as it will be faster than QL predicts and others may report. IMO, it is perfectly safe at less than 90%, if you make the necessary QL BR corrections and heed the mfr's guidance.