Home
Posted By: verns 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/04/17
I am somewhat ticked at my Ruger American for feeding issues so I'm fishing around for a LH 243 in Hawkeye or MK 11. When did Ruger begin LH in Mod 77 .I searched the net and got no results so far. Only interested in LH
Don't know when they started making left hand short actions but I believe all left hand MK II models were long actions. There's a LH 243 Hawkeye for sale in the classifieds here right now.

LH Hawkeye .243
Posted By: KenMi Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/04/17
Generally, it is a magazine issue. Many have put extra tension on the springs or had Ruger send new mags.
It would be tough to tweak a 77 to shoot as well as an American does with no modifications.
Posted By: OSU_Sig Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/04/17
If you must decide, I believe the Hawkeye is the way to go.
Posted By: coyote268 Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/04/17
I have a LH Hawkeye in 7-08 and it is a tac driving fool
Posted By: OSU_Sig Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/05/17
I like what Ruger did to the Hawkeye stock. It just feels good to me.
Posted By: verns Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/05/17
Thanks Jim ,that is a nice rifle. PM sent
Posted By: Craig2506 Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/08/17
My Hawkeye shoots everything into 1" or less with little help from the guy behind it.
This is perfect for me!
Posted By: OSU_Sig Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/30/17
Get it and tell us how it shoots for you.
Posted By: kudu3 Re: 243 Hawkeye or Mk 11 ? - 09/30/17
If you don't find one, PM me. I have a nice LH Hawkeye 243 I would sell.

Dean
© 24hourcampfire