Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#1812771 - 11/20/07 Case capacity RCM VS WSM  
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,199
noKnees Offline
Campfire Tracker
noKnees  Offline
Campfire Tracker

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,199
johnstown, NY/Bloomfield CT
Subject says it..

How do the case capacities compare 300 RCM vs 300WSM?

Basicly I am comsidering a 35 cal wildcat (350WSM, 350RCM)


The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this Republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. Coolidge
RV 728 BP
#1813024 - 11/20/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: noKnees]  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18,378
458 Lott Offline
Campfire Kahuna
458 Lott  Offline
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 18,378
Conundrum, Alaska
350 WSM is the 350 Sambar, might want to look it up.

I considered re-chambering my Ruger 350 rem mag to a 350 WSM, but then I shot it pushing 225's 2700 fps. I just have no need to push 250's 2700 fps from a lightish rifle. Something to consider. And if you aren't building a light rifle, no real reason to use the WSM platform.


45 Trumps 44

MAGA
#1813104 - 11/20/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: noKnees]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720
WhelenAway Offline
Campfire Guide
WhelenAway  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720
I don't know what the difference is, but the WSM case is .555 at the web, and the RCM case is .532. The WSM case is 2.1" long and the RCM case is 2.015".

So the WSM case appears to have a fair bit more capacity.


_


Remember the good old days, when you felt lucky to have a rifle and used it for everything ? 458Win

. . . the things that make one rifle more desirable than another go beyond shooting bullets MD
#1820432 - 11/24/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: WhelenAway]  
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 302
SlowHand Offline
Campfire Regular
SlowHand  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 302
I kind of like the idea of a short action 338 that would be between the 338-06 and the 338 win. Maybe the thinner cartridge will feed a little smoother than the WSM cartridges. Who knows.

#1821117 - 11/24/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: noKnees]  
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,187
Gasman Offline
Campfire Regular
Gasman  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,187
Two or three years ago, an Australian hunting magazine named Guns and Game ran a very informative series of articles describing how they designed, built, and hunted with a rifle chambered in the 350 Sambar round. I was able to obtain back issues from them thru their website. Here's the link if you want to pursue it further:

Guns and Game magazine


Originally Posted by RED53
Some shooting knowledge: Don't stand in front of the muzzle. Some hunting knowledge: Too much noise ruins the hunt.
#1821119 - 11/24/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: SlowHand]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720
WhelenAway Offline
Campfire Guide
WhelenAway  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720

Nothing wrong with a short action 338-06 +P. I am kind-of interested myself.

My guess is that feeding would be smoother than the WSM.

Per the reviews, in factory loaded form, it gives up nothing to the 338WM (though I am sure it does with heaviest bullets).

Hand-loads are likely to be a different proposition, with performance more like a 338-06 +P, since the propellants used in the factory ammo aren't available to the handloader.


_

#1821145 - 11/24/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: Gasman]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720
WhelenAway Offline
Campfire Guide
WhelenAway  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720

Here is some more 350WSM information:

350WSM or 35 Sambar


_

#1821213 - 11/24/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: WhelenAway]  
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,733
gerry35 Offline
Campfire Guide
gerry35  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,733
B.C.
If I were a betting man I'd say the case capacity of the 338 RCM would be very similar to the 350 Rem Mag. The 350 has a longer case which might make up for the slightly fatter but shorter RCM .


Gerry.
#1821932 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: WhelenAway]  
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,796
Brad Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Brad  Offline
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,796
Originally Posted by WhelenAway
I don't know what the difference is, but the WSM case is .555 at the web, and the RCM case is .532. The WSM case is 2.1" long and the RCM case is 2.015".

So the WSM case appears to have a fair bit more capacity.


_


Agreed.

I'm struggling to understand how two less in the magazine and poorer feeding with minimal velocity gain makes this new case a worthy choice over an 06-based round...


Cartridges are more alike than different.
There is no bad weather, only bad clothing.
308 Win. It kicks a little and kills a lot.
Adventure is just bad planning.
#1821965 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: Brad]  
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739
kutenay Offline
Campfire Outfitter
kutenay  Offline
Campfire Outfitter

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739
OH NO!!! More practical, experience based opinion!!!!

This will NEVER do, how can we accept the antique rounds from long ago when ANY hip, trendy GenXer just KNOWS that wizzums, Ultragags and whatevers ARE the BEST, man!

The next thing we will be told is that there have been NO real improvements on the .45 Colt, .45ACP, .30-06, .375H&H and .450-3.25Nitro EVER.....the whole dang industry will collapse!!!!

Juat got my final Grizzly/packing rifle yesterday, a plain, old P-64 in .375H&H, 20"sts. tube, Recnagel irons, QD mts. 2.4xC Leupy, Micky stock and Decelerator...probably gonna get et in northern BC next summer as it is not a .375Ruger, Ultramag or a .416 Lazzemacaroni Blastum Super Mag...and wasn't "designed" by Col. Alphasoup! Horrors, what shall I ever do?

#1822060 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: kutenay]  
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,796
Brad Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Brad  Offline
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,796
Geez Kute... I think I'm approaching Curmudgeonhood grin


Cartridges are more alike than different.
There is no bad weather, only bad clothing.
308 Win. It kicks a little and kills a lot.
Adventure is just bad planning.
#1822105 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: Brad]  
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,153
sdgunslinger Offline
Campfire Ranger
sdgunslinger  Offline
Campfire Ranger

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,153
Gary , SD USA
Originally Posted by Brad
Geez Kute... I think I'm approaching Curmudgeonhood grin


Ya, I'm beginging to think so , Brad...(chuckle)

I'm just wondering how you fellas *know* these new RCM cartidges are not gonna feed well ?

As for magazine capacity , IMO 3 versus 5 is not gonna make a whit of difference for 99.9 % of hunting chores .

#1822218 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: sdgunslinger]  
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739
kutenay Offline
Campfire Outfitter
kutenay  Offline
Campfire Outfitter

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739
Originally Posted by sdgunslinger
Originally Posted by Brad
Geez Kute... I think I'm approaching Curmudgeonhood grin


Ya, I'm beginging to think so , Brad...(chuckle)

I'm just wondering how you fellas *know* these new RCM cartidges are not gonna feed well ?

As for magazine capacity , IMO 3 versus 5 is not gonna make a whit of difference for 99.9 % of hunting chores .


Did I SAY anything about feeding issues? NOBODY including YOU really KNOWS yet, OK. The Wizzums HAVE HAD feeding issues in various rifles as is well documented in threads here, check the archives.

As for magazine capacity, IF, you can get equal performance with more rounds in your mag., that is a benefit in Grizzly country and this is now becoming a problem in the western US as well as Canada, so, I think it IS a serious concern.

A .338RCM crf short-actioned rifle DOES interest me, but, I found Brad's comment quite appropriate as too much emphasis is placed upon new cartridge designs and nor enough on quality control of production rifles, IMHO.

#1822365 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: kutenay]  
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,153
sdgunslinger Offline
Campfire Ranger
sdgunslinger  Offline
Campfire Ranger

Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,153
Gary , SD USA
Kute , maybe you did not mention feeding issues , but Brad did .

And your right , I don't know any more about feeding of an RCM cartridge than anyone else , but I do have some faith in Ruger producing a rifle that will feed and function.....IMO they have a good track record in that respect.

As for the magazine capacity , my take would be that if one or three shots do not sort out an unexpected grizz problem , a fella would be in deeper dodo than a couple more shots is gonna help........but I'll defer to your experience when it come to extracting one's-self from grizz dodo......

#1822389 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: sdgunslinger]  
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,308
BMT Offline
Campfire Kahuna
BMT  Offline
Campfire Kahuna

Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 20,308
Alvadore, Oregon
The 338 RCM looks cool, and probably will sell simply beause it is a short fat 338. Ruger ain't dumb, ya know.

But . . . . .I thnk I'll just shoot my 308.

BMT

Last edited by BMT; 11/25/07.

"The Church can and should help modern society by tirelessly insisting that the work of women in the home be recognized and respected by all in its irreplaceable value." Apostolic Exhortation On The Family, Pope John Paul II
#1822402 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: BMT]  
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,168
reelman Offline
Campfire Guide
reelman  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,168
Wisconsin - Land of the PACKER...
What am I missing here. The "new" RCM's are basically the same as the WSM's as far as capacity, design, etc. so why are they even coming out with them?

This whole cartridge of the month thing has to stop sometime!

#1822449 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: reelman]  
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28,857
Jeff_O Offline
Campfire Oracle
Jeff_O  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28,857
Wetter'n Oregon
Here's one more small thought. My 7mm-08 Model 7 was a somewhat "balky" feeder. When I rebarreled it to .358, it cleared that up. Feeds great now. It must be because the .35 cal bullet leaves such a small shoulder on the case, right? So maybe the same thing would happen with the WSM's necked up to .35 cal.

-jeff



Due to years of degraded public discourse, we are separate ideological countries, speaking different languages, the lines between us down. We reason differently; draw upon non-intersecting data sets, and access different mythological systems.
#1822513 - 11/25/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: Jeff_O]  
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739
kutenay Offline
Campfire Outfitter
kutenay  Offline
Campfire Outfitter

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,739
There is an old man who lives at Hagensborg, BC, in the mid-coast region of BC, his name is Jack Turner and he is the husband of Trudy Turner, daughter of Ralph Edwards,OC., the "Crusoe of Lonesome Lake, this man shot the then world-record Grizzly near their home in May, 1965.

He is, among serious, esperienced BC bush people, a living legend and at my best, I am an infant in the wilderness beside him. I knew his/Trudy's elder brother Stan at Ocean Falls nealry 40 years ago and these are simply amazing people, I say that as a member of one of the founding, pre-Confederation families in BC.

This TRUE EXPERT was attacked two years ago, in the evening, just outside his front door by FOUR yearling Grizzlies and mauled a bit. He escaped and survived, but, this is only one incident that makes me feel better with more rounds on tap.

I also MUCH prefer shallow-angled rounds for my hunting rifles, .338WM, 9.3x62 and .375H&H are my usual choices. I own a lot of Rugers, have examined a Hawkeye African and was VERY impressed, although I wishthat they had put a Rigby-style floorplate on to hold one more round and a larger button on that safety...still, one of the better factory rifles in years, IMO.

As to Brad, well, he IS a curmudgeon, a Viking AND getting on toward geezer status....what can ya do, eh?! smile smile smile MORE Moose Drool!!!!

#1826076 - 11/26/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: Brad]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720
WhelenAway Offline
Campfire Guide
WhelenAway  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720

Quote
I'm struggling to understand how two less in the magazine and poorer feeding with minimal velocity gain makes this new case a worthy choice over an 06-based round...


I think you're probably right (though I do like short actions).

Per my new issue of Rifleshooter, the 338RCM has the same case capacity as the 30-06, and the 300RCM being slightly longer sits half way between the 30-06 and 300WSM (ala 300 SAUM).

The article tries to make a case for improved short-barrel performance, and that may be the case with the tailored pressure curves Hornady ammo is providing, but of course handloaders are likely to be disappointed.

_


Remember the good old days, when you felt lucky to have a rifle and used it for everything ? 458Win

. . . the things that make one rifle more desirable than another go beyond shooting bullets MD
#1826158 - 11/26/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: WhelenAway]  
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 872
Sinman6 Offline
Campfire Regular
Sinman6  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 872
watertown, SD
i guess i didnt know people are having trouble feeding the wsm cases. my model 70 feeds them like a champ and never had one feed wrong. and i dont think anyone needs 5 rounds verses 3 rounds for hunting and if you do you might want to pratice more or get some shooting sticks.

#1826272 - 11/26/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: Sinman6]  
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720
WhelenAway Offline
Campfire Guide
WhelenAway  Offline
Campfire Guide

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,720

You really haven't been paying attention, have you?

There have been many reports of poor feeding, though I have owned at least 10 of them and have also seen no problem.

It is true, however, that they don't feed as smoothly as a 30-06 or other slimmer rounds with more generous body taper and less acute shoulder angle.

As far as magazine capacity, I don't place much value beyond the third round myself, but a lot of guys on this forum do.

Either way though, it appears that performance of the RCM rounds will be very close to the 30-06 and 338-06 in handloaded form due to limited case capacity.

With no performance advantage, you really have to LOVE short actions to jump in.

_


Remember the good old days, when you felt lucky to have a rifle and used it for everything ? 458Win

. . . the things that make one rifle more desirable than another go beyond shooting bullets MD
#1826336 - 11/26/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: WhelenAway]  
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28,857
Jeff_O Offline
Campfire Oracle
Jeff_O  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 28,857
Wetter'n Oregon
.... just buy a .325 WSM. It's a proven round... as much as a WSM can be anyway... and it'll do the same dang thing!

-jeff


Due to years of degraded public discourse, we are separate ideological countries, speaking different languages, the lines between us down. We reason differently; draw upon non-intersecting data sets, and access different mythological systems.
#1826568 - 11/26/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: Jeff_O]  
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,198
David_Walter Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
David_Walter  Offline
Campfire 'Bwana

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 12,198
TriCities, WA
I'm not an old sourdough, but the time I was charged by a griz on Kodiak, I recall thinking that more rounds would be better than less rounds.

I never ever want to be afield with a rifle that does not feed perfect every time.



"I arise in the morning, torn between the desire to improve the world, and a desire to enjoy the world. This makes it difficult to plan the day." eb white
#1826609 - 11/26/07 Re: Case capacity RCM VS WSM [Re: David_Walter]  
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,833
AFP Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
AFP  Offline
Campfire 'Bwana

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,833
The RCM has potential to be a smooth feeder. Belted mags--gun scribe rantings aside, typically feed very smoothly. Crud, my M-70 375 H&H will feed and chamber empty cases. A belted mag is nominally .532 at the rim and the belt.

The WSMs have had their share of feeding issues. They have a nominal .550 head diameter.

The RCM has a head diameter of a belted mag. Since the belted mags feed well, an RCM would seem to have a good chance of feeding well too.

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

RV 180 2
OX 160 1
RBCN 160 3
Who's Online Now
76 registered members (Autofive, 7fa, 37L1, AKPENDUDE, alaska_lanche, 280Ackleyrized, 6 invisible), 441 guests, and 621 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
NMX 160









Copyright © 2000-2017 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.078s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 1.0996 MB (Peak: 1.4360 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-26 09:23:53 UTC