In Oregon it's against the law for a business owner to refuse service to someone because of their sexual orientation. http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/659A.403

It's also against the law for a business owner to announce that they will refuse service to anyone because of their sexual orientation. http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/659A.409

The "gag order" simply enforced that law....The owners of Sweetcakes couldn't say that they would refuse service to homosexuals. The judge didn't say anything that Oregon law didn't already say.

It is NOT against the law in Oregon to preach against homosexuality. And the "gag order" didn't prevent that.

So it was a gag order in the sense that the Sweetcakes owners were told to not say things that were illegal to say.

But the "gag order" didn't tell them to not share their faith.

Originally Posted by SBTCO
your flippant remarks which you so adeptly sling