Originally Posted by Deerwhacker444
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
..I would "think"..in CA.

Those 2 words don't belong in the same paragraph.

Looking thru CA's regs they have published,..you talk about a Hodge Podge of Gobbledegook.! A gigantic collection of "feel good" regs that have nothing to do with the lethality of individual weapons. I'm certain LEO's in CA don't know all the regs about whats legal and what's not. I have a feeling they would arrest you on the spot and hold you until they found something in the CA gun laws to get you on.

My kin would surely get a kick out of shooting something different but I probably won't risk it, don't want to end up in Chino because the front sight is fiber optic an not as issued...


DW, there have been many cases in CA where a gun owner was arrested for a completely legal firearm just because the officers involved were unable to understand the CA laws.

In this case you are probably right. Discretion is the better part of valor. They can shoot it when they come see you.

You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell