Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Ask The Gunwriters Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?

Print Thread

Hop To

Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye? old_willys #10372006 09/01/15
Joined: Jan 2015 Posts: 194 T TheBlueMountainApe Campfire Member
TheBlueMountainApe Campfire Member T Joined: Jan 2015 Posts: 194	They did build a light Hawkeye. It was called the Ultra Light IIRC. Must not have sold very well though because it was discontinued. Weight is not the only reason RARs sell. There's a lot more to it than that. ------------------------------ The APE "But resist we much...we must...and we will much...about...that...be committed." - the "Reverend" Al Sharpton

GB1

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	old_willys	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	TheBlueMountainApe	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	noKnees	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	TheBlueMountainApe	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	shawlerbrook	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Jim in Idaho	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Jim in Idaho	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	prairie_goat	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	pointer	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	prairie_goat	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Mule Deer	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	old_willys	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	AMRA	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	StudDuck	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Canazes9	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	shortactionsmoker	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	prairie_goat	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Mule Deer	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	prairie_goat	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	EdM	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Pappy348	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Pappy348	09/01/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	EZEARL	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Pappy348	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	pointer	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Steve Redgwell	09/02/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Pappy348	09/03/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	DakotaDeer	09/03/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	duckster	09/04/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	kk alaska	09/04/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Mule Deer	09/04/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Elkhunter49	09/04/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Klikitarik	09/04/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Steve Redgwell	09/04/15
Re: Why couldn't Ruger just build a lighter weight Hawkeye?	Canazes9	09/04/15

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

584 members (10ring1, 1936M71, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 160user, 06hunter59, 62 invisible), 2,490 guests, and 623 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,193,441

Posts18,507,767

Members74,002

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.108s Queries: 17 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8641 MB (Peak: 0.9074 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-13 03:05:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS