Originally Posted by NeBassman
The OK "state" Constitution does clearly define limitations of influence from religion.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ic-display-of-ten-commandments-monument/

Quote
No public money or property shall ever be appropriated, applied, donated, or used, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or sectarian institution as such.


Quote
And the Oklahoma Supreme Court held that the monument (paid for by private money, but installed on public land in 2012) violated that provision:


The legislature will address this shortcoming very soon, backed by the people who live in what is undoubtedly the most conservative state in the union. The judges in question will soon rue this too....

One man with courage makes a majority....

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~