Just returning a few business favors.
Doesn't mean its a bad decision?
I'm not saying he wouldn't be a better choice than the current, but why not the cream of the crop??? Somebody with actual first hand experience at neutralizing terrorist threats? Proactive vs. reactive?
Different position than what you're talking about. A War fighter as you describe isn't what is needed for head of DHS. DHS chief has to manage an enormous agency, deal with a multitude of other agencies at federal, state, and local levels; deal with Congress; and somehow still manage to be effective in defense of the nation without tripping over his dick.
Find someone more qualified than Guiliani.
BTW - Guiliani as DHS chief just smacked Hitlery in the kisser re: NYS. Rudy as part of Trump's Cabinet, and in charge of DHS, opens up the "Bill and Hitlery didn't take out UBL; I was there for the aftermath" line of attack, and it puts NYS/NYC/NJ closer to being in play.
