They've been playing with it for a long damned time. The Supreme Court once said that they can prohibit you from having a backyard garden because the corn you wouldn't buy because you had that garden was part of the stream of interstate commerce. If they can justify that, they can do anything.
The document is open to interpretation by the Courts. That's why they are there.
Just because things don't always go as you like, you don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
It seems like the only time it's " interpreted" is when someone, usually the government, wants to do something to somebody, usually " We The People", that the Constitution already expressly prohibits them from doing, in plain simple English that even lawyers, judges, and politicians ought to be able to understand.
