You sound a lot like Saul Alinsky. You make stuff, which, of course, you can't defend because it's made up; therefore, you're left with but one tactic, which is logical fallacy: calling name just like a girly man. Put up or keep your fingers off of your keyboard.
Now, I've asked you for a cite to your polling data. You can't link one. Hence, the inference is you made it up in order to further a neocon agenda.
"Ryan isn’t the first speaker, or leader, to be in trouble. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor lost his seat in a surprise primary loss in Virginia in 2014. House Speaker Tom Foley, a Democrat, lost his reelection bid in 1994. But before that, you have to go back to 1862 for another example of an unseated Speaker.
Is Ryan really in trouble? He’s in trouble enough to be running television ads. A recent poll had Ryan ahead 43% to Nehlen’s 32%, but that shows a race tightening—Ryan was ahead by 40 points or more in two previous polls. Wisconsin is one of the few states that bucked the Trump train, its powerful GOP establishment depriving Trump of a primary win. Ryan also spends an enormous amount of time in the district, returning home every weekend to spend time with his wife and three young children.
At the same time, Ryan’s initial refusal to support Trump and his not-so-thinly veiled criticism of his party’s likely nominee hasn’t helped him with GOP primary voters in Wisconsin’s 1st District, according to David Wasserman, who follows House races for the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. “My impression is that [Ryan] only would’ve been in danger had he continued to hold out on Trump,” Wasserman says. “He starts off with a much deeper base in the district that Cantor ever did.”
What is anti-Semitism? It sounds like one of your rules for disinformation. Did you learn it from Saul Alinsky? Are you a soldier in America's fifth column?
