I'm not impressed with the .33 Nosler.
It shoots a bullet weighing only 25 grains more than a plain old .300 Weatherby, but 35 fps slower than the Weatherby, and with a slightly worse ballistic coefficient. Does anyone believe that a slightly slower bullet, weighing only about half as much as a .22 long rifle bullet more, would be even noticeable?
One would think that they could have made more of an improvement in the last 72 years.
It's the case being shorter for better bullets. I'm sure you still don't get it though.
