Somehow I don't think the article is going to suddenly make anyone a rabid anti hunter. If they were anti hunting before reading they article, they'd just say uh huh, if they were favorable to hunting they'd think well sure if you kill animals that contributes to a declining heard.
Sounds like a thread by someone who's just looking to be butt hurt about something. And the usual idiots adding their two cents.
You are right, IMHO, but its not the ones that are already pro or anti, its the neutral folks you always want to consider....
