I am looking forward to trying one. The price point is good and they come with real sights. I've carried Sigs but the magazines are expensive and support gear has been slow to come to market and with less choices. The army adopting the gun will take care of the support gear problem and, hopefully, magazines won't cost an arm and a leg. It also will result in accelerated demand and T&E by end users.
My only complaint with Sigs is that they are fatter, taller and heavier than they need to be for CCW. On paper, this still appears to be the case, but less so than with the non-polymer guns. The real test, however, will be how they feel in the hand, conceal and shoot.
I think they feel better, as most people Ive asked. They are equally reliable, the trigger is better. I think most people who have no experience with neither would choose the Sig over the Glock.
