Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by benchman
So, it looks like a weapon of war? That's the whole reason for the 2nd! The weapons are SUPPOSED to be weapons of war.
Seems pretty clear from the words. Not about sport shooting or hunting.


What part of "shall not be infringed" is confusing?

You guys that want to throw hunting arms off the sleigh to the wolves are the same as the Fudds.

If you think it's constitutional to restrict hunting arms you need to read a Constitution book. shocked
I had no implication that sporting arms are not ok Constitutionally. I was pointing out that no restrictions of any kind of arms, are specified in the Constitution.