Originally Posted by WhelenAway


Experience says I can easily get 2500fps from the Whelen with a 250gr. bullet (.279SD), and typical 35 cal. bullet construction is perfect for these velocities.

Just don't see much advantage.



A 9,3x62 will do 2600b-2650 with 250gr bullets. 2650fps vs 2500 fps with a 250gr bullet may not be a huge difference but it's a signifigant difference nonetheless. MD did some pressure testing on this and found that it was well below normal pressure limits in modern rifles. Factory 9,3x62 ammo is loaded to lower pressures in deference to some old Mausers out there. In modern rifles it can be safely loaded to the same pressures as newer rounds and easily exceed factory velocities. It's abilities with the 286gr bullet are what really set it apart from the 35 Whelen.
I like to think of the 9,3x62 as a 36 Whelen improved, a 30-06 case in 36 Caliber with the shoulder moved forwards for greater capacity. Not a huge difference but an improvement.
Plus it's a classic African hunting round and has a lot more history to it than the Whelen......................DJ


Remember this is all supposed to be for fun.......................