Thanks BSA! I've got the twin to your 338 also in a brown Poundr but it's on a standard action. Comes in at 7 pounds 6 ounces so I'm suspicious that there is a decent weight difference at play. Granted barrel length and profile could be partly to blame as well. Mines a 26 inch barrel and somewhere around a #3 profile.
Could you explain further about how the H&H receiver lets you get an extra round fitting down below? I'm not seeing offhand how that would happen, but I'm not doubting it.
Good question. The H&H magnums hold 4 in the mag box. As does my H&H receiver 338wm and 300wby. Love both rifles and they function just like any pre 64 model 70. Without flaw.
Now, does the H&H receiver make enough sense to go that route over a standard receiver? I remember saying something to the affect, why do guys make such a big deal over Talley lightweights? And I remember Brad saying "every ounce counts". I would not kick a std receiver 338wm out of bed though, and your rifle weighing 7 pounds and 6 oz's is not bad. It seems like the older I get, I understand what he was saying. An 8 pound all up 300wby or 338wm works awesome for elk hunting, where you are packing the dang thing all day long. I don't typically use a sling either. So it's in the hand all day long. There's a huge difference between a 10 pounder and an 8 pounder. Also keep in mind a well balanced rifle can weigh a little more than a poorly balanced one. The ones pictured above are about perfect for balance and weight. They carry very well, IMHO..
Going back to your comment about the barrel profile. The 338wm I have is a medium contour and is 24" long. The 300wby has the factory barrel on it. I know where another one is that is exactly like that one, but in a factory stock. It's had a recoil pad added, but is priced at $1,000.00. Which is pretty reasonable for what it is. I may swing by and take another look at that rifle today. I'll also be looking at a 1940 30-06 for $650. Should be a fun day.. Oh, and Scotty's rifle is a beauty there.. Love that 7 mashy!!