I wish that they would do the gel tests at farther distances, to show more realisitic bullet performance. 10 feet does not show much, other than the fact that it will take a lot of punishment.

That appears to be a very viable bullet for 99 percent of hunting situations, though.


You did not "seen" anything, you "saw" it.
A "creek" has water in it, a "crick" is what you get in your neck.
Liberals with guns are nothing but hypocrites.