Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Optics Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42

Print Thread

Hop To

Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42 2Shot #4494444 10/11/10
Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 18,477 Likes: 2 OreGONE G GreatWaputi Campfire Ranger
GreatWaputi Campfire Ranger G Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 18,477 Likes: 2 OreGONE	Trinovid is great glass, but IMO, not worth $1k, especially in today's economy.

GB1

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	2Shot	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	Gone_Huntin	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	2Shot	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	GreatWaputi	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	RDFinn	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	FOsteology	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	2Shot	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	GreatWaputi	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	Farmboy1	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	handwerk	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	leftycarbon	10/12/10
Re: Swarovski SLC NEU vs. Trinovid 10X42	JGRaider	10/12/10

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

631 members (10gaugemag, 06hunter59, 10gaugeman, 1badf350, 007FJ, 67 invisible), 3,095 guests, and 1,327 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,193,752

Posts18,514,685

Members74,010

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.122s Queries: 17 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8160 MB (Peak: 0.8375 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-16 02:33:36 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS