Originally Posted by Supertrucker
Per the Swarovski Optik website:

EL 10x42 = 29.6 (the 8.5x42's weigh 29.4)
SLC 10x42 = 28.0

I have no problem lifting either, but I do have a problem shelling out the extra quan for nothing.


I don't think the weight difference has anything to do with whatever extra cost is involved. I think (as in JGRaider's) post that the difference is mainly in the supposedly flat fov of the EL. I don't think centerfield resolution is likely distinguishable between the two by the normal human eye. I know a lot of people think they "need" a flat, sharp to the edge fov, but I can think of nothing more unnatural to do to my eyes than spending time suquinting through the edge of the field. So I guess it gets down to how much you value a flat field (and if you are willing to experience rolling ball effect, some won't see that either) or whether a bit less edge sharpness with equal centerfield resolution for less money is more to your liking.


Steve

Theodore Roosevelt: "Do what you can where you are with what you have"