I have two LC Smith sidelocks, and a few boxlocks. I can't tell any difference in performance. The thing about sidelocks is supposed to be you can remove the locks easily, although I don't know if that's the case or not. Boxlocks are generally heavier in the lock mechanism, but very reliable. LC Smiths in particular (post WW I ones) are notorious for cracking the stock behind the locks. American Walnut is the culprit, during and after WW I European walnut became impossible to get, and in general pre-war wood is superior to post war wood. On Parkers and Smiths.
My personal preference in guns is the boxlock Parkers and the RBL. Although I love my LCs too!
I don't like the fake sidelocks, and got rid of mine. Nothing wrong with them except they're fake, otherwise they shoot just fine. I had a Fabarms, super gun, but couldn't live with the fake side plates. Same with the CZ sideplate guns.
Last edited by Gene L; 12/18/11.
