Correct.
Let me offer my experience with QL, so that you have some context against which to evaluate my original reply to you--
I find QL very entertaining. I enjoy the alternative powder suggestions it is able to provide, and I really appreciate having % case fill info. On a couple of occasions, it has been _dramatically_ far off in its predictions. Be careful with it; it can be very fun, but in no way would I use it as a replacement in isolation for pressure-tested data.
