Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by HugAJackass
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER

Does Ron Paul�s �long track record of consistency, character, authenticity, and being proven right over a long period of time� include his newsletters from the 1990�s about signing up and sending money to get the latest on the changing the colors of our currency conspiracy?

I don't know. What about Newt's News Letter praising Hillary Care? He claimed that his name being on the newsletter didn't mean he wrote it. Paul gave the same explanation. Paul gave permission to a group he generally agrees with on the subject of economics permission to run a news letter with his name on it. His mistake was in not closely monitoring its contents for material that could easily be taken the wrong way. Not complicated.


Repeatedly over 16 years!?

That's some oversight there.

Yeah, he'd make a GREAT POTUS.... crazy
Over that period of time, one or two items could be taken out of context and convincingly twisted by the Campfire's leftists. Not a bad record.


If by one or two, you mean dozens, then yeah, I guess you're correct....


"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Turdlike, by default.