Bible critics have long used use the "lack of evidence proves something" tactic. �
If this isn't a forensic law, it oughta be �
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.Bible critics also try to wring mileage out of the notion that mention of something or other in another ancient writing (Noah's flood, for example), as evidence of a "borrowed myth," destroys the credence of its mention in the Bible.
Pardon me, but I thought that two pedestrians testifying that they saw Banjoe mug the nun was customarily considered pretty good evidence that Banjoe mugged the nun.
