Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Winchester Collectors Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?

Print Thread

Hop To

Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ? #8798992 04/21/14
Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 6,240 Likes: 1 wherever the deer are yar OP Campfire Tracker
OP yar Campfire Tracker Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 6,240 Likes: 1 wherever the deer are	Just inherited a family Heirloom Winchester 1892 in 38WCF (1893 vintage) Rifles in tip top shape. Is it safe to use smokeless powder in this rifle? I know the later model were just don't know about early model 92's.

GB1

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	yar	04/22/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	TheOldTree	04/22/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	JBLEDSOE	04/22/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	TheOldTree	04/22/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	yar	04/22/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	dubePA	04/23/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	yooper35	04/23/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	shrapnel	04/23/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	TheOldTree	04/23/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	yar	04/24/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	tbear99	04/27/14
Re: Antique Winchester 1892 black powder or smokeless ?	30Gibbs	04/28/14

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

606 members (22kHornet, 222Sako, 204guy, 01Foreman400, 10Glocks, 61 invisible), 2,503 guests, and 1,318 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,192,602

Posts18,492,278

Members73,972

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.131s Queries: 16 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8152 MB (Peak: 0.8367 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 23:36:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS