Originally Posted by T_O_M
Originally Posted by bellydeep
Because obviously the conclusion was reached without any actual experience in the task at hand.

Obvious?

Y' know what it tells me about your intelligence when you call something "obvious" that is absolutely wrong?

Yep, confirmed: you won the dumb [bleep] award.

Tom


Lets recap:

You tell a story about waiting for a wounded elk to be pushed to you.

You had a .257 Roberts.

You sat there waiting and decided it was too small.

The elk never came out, so you never got to try the .257 and gain ACTUAL experience.

The next year you killed your FIRST elk with a .300 Win.





I think that about covers it?

Show me again where you actually tried to kill an elk with your .257 before deciding it was too small and moving to a .300 Win?


Originally Posted by shrapnel
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle.


Originally Posted by JohnBurns
I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.