There is no actual physical distinction of aerosol versus airborne. It is on a physical continuum, and thus either transmission method can be defined as one wishes to further whatever philosophical agenda they might have.
Both sides of this debate are being very disingenuous in the discussion.
There is however a clear and concise difference and distinction in airborne an blood borne pathogens.
Ebola is a blood borne pathogen. Like HIV.
If an HIV homo spits in your mouth from 3 feet away and you get HIV, it doesn't make it airborne.
I can't believe we are having to define this over and over and over to people that are smart enough to even operate a computer.
