24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 29 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 28 29
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,814
Likes: 3
W
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,814
Likes: 3
JWP and others who mentioned Jelly Bryce.. Not to derail this discussion, but this looks like a great read.. Col Charles Askins was an interesting guy, but Bryce looks outstanding.. Thanks for the info.. Please continue the discussion...


Molon Labe
GB1

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,236
Likes: 17
T
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,236
Likes: 17
My grandad grew up in the same area Bryce lived in. He said when he was a kid that Bryce would put on a shooting expo at the local fair. His finale was to have a boy from the audience throw a silver dollar as high as he could and he would shoot it out of the air with a M70 in 270. The hunt was then on for the dollar as it was finders keepers.

Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,814
Likes: 3
W
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,814
Likes: 3
Kid, interesting story.. What state would that have happened in??
Tales like this are so often lost to history.. Just order the Bryce books.. Got carried away and ordered one about Hamer and a Texas Ranger book.. Thanks for the story..

Now on with the discussion..


Molon Labe
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,236
Likes: 17
T
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 8,236
Likes: 17
SW Oklahoma. My grandad was raised between Broxton and Alden. Bryce lived in the Mtn View area. The fair probably took place in Carnagie. Broxton, Alden, and to some degree Mtn View are all ghost towns now.

Another friend of mine, who is from the Mtn View area, his grandfather was good friends with Bryce until his death.

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,632
Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,632
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by jwp475

Kevin, Clint Smith does not see eye to eye with Ayoob and who can blame him?

Quote


CLINT SMITH ON THE 1911
“The 1911 remains popular because it’s an efficient tool. In more than 30 years of experience, I’ve met more competent, serious gunmen who carry 1911’s than those who pack any other handgun. They are professionals – policemen, government agents and others who carry handguns daily because the know their live may depend on it…Me? I’ve carried a 1911 every single day for the past 20 years. It’s a very comforting gun to have at your hip. It offers a good, consistent single-action trigger pull and is wonderfully dependable. Because the 1911 is basically a defensive handgun, I’m not concerned about tight groups. I don’t bother with expanding hollowpoints that could cause feeding problems. For absolute reliability, I shoot only high-quality ball ammunition. That big .45 slug doesn’t have to expand to be effective.” From Guns and Ammo, September, 2001.



I have and will have a lot of respect for Clint Smith. We all say stupid stuff occasionally...


"Chances Will Be Taken"


IC B2

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,632
Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,632
Likes: 4
I view Massad Ayoob as a guy who had a message that needed to be heard.

IMO, that message was delivered 30 some years ago. Still he wants to be heard, so he comes up with some off the wall stuff...

I got no issue with those who want to read him and quote him. Don't take it too far, and hold the angst...


"Chances Will Be Taken"


Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,814
Likes: 3
W
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
W
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,814
Likes: 3
Kid, you should write down as much as you can about that situation. I done it a couple times with older friends, and failed to do so with a couple other much to my dismay...


Molon Labe
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,128
Likes: 11
M
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
M
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,128
Likes: 11
I say just choose a sensible weapon/load, be able to use it, and get on with life.

Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 17,101
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 17,101
Originally Posted by gmoats
Originally Posted by bfrshooter
Simple, a good cop wants to live and protect but if he does kill, he is raked over the coals. Rev Al and Obumber will try him without facts. See what is going on since our cops now fear to protect. They get what they deserve in those cities.
I will stand behind our LEO's every step. Need a .50 BMG, so be it. Poor performance from a gun has killed more good people then anything.
I am old and if you steal a horse you should hang. No political correct junk.
Do you know how many of our troops were killed by being issued a Mattel gun that would not shoot through a tree or jungle? The AK was better.
To limit power is only to please the liberal creeps.
No, I would not shoot a creep if a woman and child was behind him but I might die too. Your choice.
Since most can't hit anyway even if a bullet stops in a creep. Who says the bystander is safe? Real life is to kill when a threat is there. Taze a creep that dies, tough, he should not have done wrong. I'm harsh and looters should be taken out before they leave the stores they loot.

….you obviously should be teaching logic at the local University……ethics or military history could be your fall-back curricula…...



Anything but writing 101


The government plans these shootings by targeting kids from kindergarten that the government thinks they can control with drugs until the appropriate time--DerbyDude


Whatever. Tell the oompa loompa's hey for me. [/quote]. LtPPowell


Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
I say just choose a sensible weapon/load, be able to use it, and get on with life.


Way too much common sense in that post.


Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
IC B3

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,676
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,676
Originally Posted by gmoats
Originally Posted by bfrshooter
Simple, a good cop wants to live and protect but if he does kill, he is raked over the coals. Rev Al and Obumber will try him without facts. See what is going on since our cops now fear to protect. They get what they deserve in those cities.
I will stand behind our LEO's every step. Need a .50 BMG, so be it. Poor performance from a gun has killed more good people then anything.
I am old and if you steal a horse you should hang. No political correct junk.
Do you know how many of our troops were killed by being issued a Mattel gun that would not shoot through a tree or jungle? The AK was better.
To limit power is only to please the liberal creeps.
No, I would not shoot a creep if a woman and child was behind him but I might die too. Your choice.
Since most can't hit anyway even if a bullet stops in a creep. Who says the bystander is safe? Real life is to kill when a threat is there. Taze a creep that dies, tough, he should not have done wrong. I'm harsh and looters should be taken out before they leave the stores they loot.

….you obviously should be teaching logic at the local University……ethics or military history could be your fall-back curricula…...

No good, I would be labeled a racist. I really am one even though I have friends of all colors and respect and love them. It is those that break the law or suck from the tax payers I hate.
See them every day at the meat counter, toss the most expensive meat in the cart until it is full, wine and smokes too. Run the SNAP card. Most weigh 300 to 400# and kids are fat. How do you get fat if you don't work?
If you have ever been out of work, did you try to get food stamps? Big stinking joke! Yes I am a racist and it does not matter what color the dip is.
The only good BG is a dead one.
I have always said to cure DC or some cities is to fly over and dump drugs and cheap guns.
I love the cops standing back and letting them kill each other. My chile was a good boy, broke dat window and gived me a big TV. Said yo is po, go back fo the DVD player and stop at the drug sto fo some good smack. Bama will not let anyone hurt you, put them in jail.
I would use napalm on the streets.
If I was a judge and you killed, you will hang tomorrow at dawn, no appeals and 20 years on the peoples dime.
A felon with a gun, instant life, federal offense not upheld.
Have a carry permit, go into DC with a gun and you will be arrested. Be black and you can't be stopped so the gun you stole is now in the city. Great country or what?

Last edited by bfrshooter; 06/13/15.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by RGK
Originally Posted by GunGeek
I guess we just can't have this discussion here. Why are we talking about Ayoob? Whether you agree with or disagree with his conclusions (and for the 4th time, I personally disagree with his conclusions)is not the discussion. But just because I disagreed with his conclusions doesn't mean I disregard the data.

The discussion is about the data he presents in the articles, not his conclusions. The data remains regardless of the writer or his conclusions. Is no one capable of discerning this? Or do you think the data is all made up?

I guess this is why lawyers tear down the witness, because most don't have the critical thinking skills to differentiate between message and messenger.


I understand your frustration, but data acceptability is based to some degree on credibility; in this case, Ayoob's. If you're interested in pistol round penetration, read about Dr Fackler's (COL, MD, ret) testing and conclusions. No issues with creds or data, at least with the US Army, FBI, LAPD, etc.
Bob


Exactly!
Well you could have credibility issues with his conclusions . as for the data if you have credibility issues with that that means you suspect he could be lying about the data . So I'll ask straight up, do you think he's lying?

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by RGK
Originally Posted by GunGeek
I guess we just can't have this discussion here. Why are we talking about Ayoob? Whether you agree with or disagree with his conclusions (and for the 4th time, I personally disagree with his conclusions)is not the discussion. But just because I disagreed with his conclusions doesn't mean I disregard the data.

The discussion is about the data he presents in the articles, not his conclusions. The data remains regardless of the writer or his conclusions. Is no one capable of discerning this? Or do you think the data is all made up?

I guess this is why lawyers tear down the witness, because most don't have the critical thinking skills to differentiate between message and messenger.


I understand your frustration, but data acceptability is based to some degree on credibility; in this case, Ayoob's. If you're interested in pistol round penetration, read about Dr Fackler's (COL, MD, ret) testing and conclusions. No issues with creds or data, at least with the US Army, FBI, LAPD, etc.
Bob
I don't always agree with his conclusions but I've never seen anything to make me think he was flat out lying. in that business is just way too easy to be caught in a lie, and if you are caught the shooting community would essentially run you out of your job. The man has been doing it for nearly 40 years if he had a habit of lying about data he would've been caught. given that the data presented is consistent with the experiences of other departments I personally don't question the data even though I do question his conclusions.

Last edited by GunGeek; 06/13/15.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 22,000
Likes: 3
H
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
H
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 22,000
Likes: 3
I have learned a lot in this thread....water heaters and Tempurpedics can stop Gold Dots, forevah!

And I too would use napalm on the streets....because its over-penetration is a non-issue.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14,654
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 14,654
Who is Ayoob?


Originally Posted by SBTCO
your flippant remarks which you so adeptly sling
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,699
R
RGK Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,699
Originally Posted by GunGeek
Originally Posted by RGK
Originally Posted by GunGeek
I guess we just can't have this discussion here. Why are we talking about Ayoob? Whether you agree with or disagree with his conclusions (and for the 4th time, I personally disagree with his conclusions)is not the discussion. But just because I disagreed with his conclusions doesn't mean I disregard the data.

The discussion is about the data he presents in the articles, not his conclusions. The data remains regardless of the writer or his conclusions. Is no one capable of discerning this? Or do you think the data is all made up?

I guess this is why lawyers tear down the witness, because most don't have the critical thinking skills to differentiate between message and messenger.


I understand your frustration, but data acceptability is based to some degree on credibility; in this case, Ayoob's. If you're interested in pistol round penetration, read about Dr Fackler's (COL, MD, ret) testing and conclusions. No issues with creds or data, at least with the US Army, FBI, LAPD, etc.
Bob
I don't always agree with his conclusions but I've never seen anything to make me think he was flat out lying. in that business is just way too easy to be caught in a lie, and if you are caught the shooting community would essentially run you out of your job. The man has been doing it for nearly 40 years if he had a habit of lying about data he would've been caught. given that the data presented is consistent with the experiences of other departments I personally don't question the data even though I do question his conclusions.


Gotta read my posts, Bro. Never said Ayoob was "lying". I said his credibility comes up short, due to a lack of experience as a street cop. If you haven't "been there and done that", you gotta get your data somewhere, so you use data from other sources, instead of personal experience. Doing traffic stops on hay-balers in a 1-stoplight town in New Hampshire doesn't qualify. Again, Ayoob is a good writer and apparently a nice guy. He doesn't 'LIE" but he writes articles about what he knows sells (gunfights and shooting), pimps himself off to defense attorneys as an expert (it's easy to get court-qualified on most any subject) and travels the country with his LFI roadshow (at least, that's what he used to call his courses). His conclusions are sometimes based on stuff ("data") that's wrong, but he doesn't know any better, because he's never been in a shooting, or even an almost-shooting. Some of the stuff he puts out as "data" is incorrect or flat-out dumb, but he goes by what he's been told by others, or what he's read, like most everyone else. It's a buyer's market for shooting instructors that teach you what to expect in a gunfight; most are full of BS. I'd rather listen to folks that have personal experience, several times over. They're out there; people like Kyle Lamb, Scotty Reitz, Larry Mudgett or Bill Allard. You just gotta be careful picking your "expert". It's your ass, after all.
Bob

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
I follow you, but what he's reporting isn't HIS data, it's NYPD data. So either he's lying about NYPD's data, grossly misrepresenting the data, or the data is correct. Now if it was his data, that would be very different. But he's presenting this as NYPD's data so one theoretically could cross check the data to see if it was being represented accurately. Two of his editors are retired cops, and would have access to the same data. Also, at the time he writes the article, he would have been required to submit his source data to the editor. That's so the editor can determine if it's correct, or perhaps put up a chart, or to cross check his work if they so desired.

Now clearly others disagree with me, but I don't find it likely that he lied or mid-represented the actual data. I've never felt he was dumb, and to do so would be incredibly dumb because it would be SO easy to get caught. I just don't see him putting his entire livelihood on the line so he could fake a point...but that's just me. Additionally the data lines up with news articles I have read back in the late '80's and early '90's of officers who had been shot by their partners via pass through.

If the data is his, then everything would be dependent solely on the presenter.

I guess we'll just have to disagree. I find the data credible, you and others don't. So that makes the entire thread rather moot.

Regards sir...
Kevin

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
GunGeek Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 24,675
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
I say just choose a sensible weapon/load, be able to use it, and get on with life.
Well it was just supposed to be just a nuanced discussion as a "food for thought". But it quickly got very positional and off track. Next thing I know, there's the hint that I'm somehow now advocating rounds with insufficient penetration, because on the internet people seem to always have to push things to an extreme...when all it was was a "sometimes you can have too much of a good thing".

But you're right...absolutely right. Sensible weapon and load, then be done with it and now worry about the "loose nut behind the trigger". If some don't believe that there is such a thing as too much of a good thing, that's fine with me.

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,997
Likes: 8
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,997
Likes: 8



Quote
“According to statistics released by the department, 15 innocent bystanders were struck by police officers using full metal jacket bullets during 1995 and 1996, the police said. Eight were hit directly, five were hit by bullets that had passed through other people and two were hit by bullets that had passed through objects,” stated the Times.
He goes on to say that is a rate of 33%.

[quote] 17 Officers Shot Due to Over Penetration
The Times continued, “In that same period, 44 police officers were struck by gunfire using
the old ammunition: 21 were hit directly, 2 were struck by bullets that ricocheted and[b]

What is the realavance of this? If you are down range of any target or near the target you are likely to get hit. That is the bottom line.



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,997
Likes: 8
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,997
Likes: 8

Quote by Dr. Martin Fackler
Quote


MacPherson has included an outline of the contents of his book's chapters in the introduction, as well as providing an excellent summary at the end of each chapter. He exposes and corrects common fallacies -- such as the presumption that kinetic energy determines bullet effect. In that section we find:

Newton's laws of motion describe forces and momentum transfer, not energy relationships
Damage is done by stress (force), not energy.
Stresses cause damage only if they strain body tissues above their elastic limits. Most expanding handgun bullets simply waste the kinetic energy used in producing the small temporary cavities they cause.
Included is an excellent clarification of statistics for the layman. It explains how the seemingly plausible collection of data from shootings is immensely compounded by the large number of variables; that any claim that incapacitation from bullet hits can be assessed within a few percent based on shooting data "is based on ignorance, or fraud, or both." This easy to understand primer on statistics should enable the layman to avoid being misled by data that is "too good to be true."



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Page 6 of 29 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 28 29

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

270 members (222Sako, 12344mag, 160user, 1badf350, 10Glocks, 257 roberts, 32 invisible), 1,969 guests, and 981 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,539
Posts18,531,126
Members74,039
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.110s Queries: 55 (0.035s) Memory: 0.9337 MB (Peak: 1.0597 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-23 11:00:49 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS