24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132
TC1 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132
I ordered an 84L when they 1st came out. The stock was so twisted and stressed the barrel was close to coming out of the stock near the end of the forearm. The inletting was atrocious. I called Kimber and they agreed to replace the stock. When it arrived back it looked like it had been drug around the shop for a few days. The metal was all scared up. A brand new rifle that looked like it had been riding under my truck seat for a few years.

Never again.




HR IC

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 244
B
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
B
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 244
Got two Montana's - 280 AI and 325 WSM , both good shooters. Wouldn't hesitate to buy another. Terry

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,787
N
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
N
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,787
My .260 and .223 are/were fine from the box. Those that friends grabbed were the same. Lucky I guess......

Now I'm looking at a .308 just to consolidate the safe. I think I'm in the wrong place to be discussing "cutting back" smile


�Out of every one hundred men, ten shouldn't even be there, eighty are just targets, nine are the real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the one, one is a warrior, and he will bring the others back.�
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,723
L
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
L
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,723
I will have a Montana in 7mm saum in a couple weeks.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
Bought my one and only Montana a few years ago. While I didn't reload for it I tried 5 or so different factory loads (30.06). Best I got was about 2 in. At 100 yards. I had to sell it because I needed the money. I wouldn't buy another though. Today my mountain rifle is a Ruger Compact in .308

IC B2

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,074
Bought my one and only Montana a few years ago. While I didn't reload for it I tried 5 or so different factory loads (30.06). Best I got was about 2 in. At 100 yards. I had to sell it because I needed the money. I wouldn't buy another though. Today my mountain rifle is a Ruger Compact in .308

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,443
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,443
Picked up a 7mm-08 Montana here about a month ago it shoots great and super light at 5lbs 14oz with scope and rings.

Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132
TC1 Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,132
Originally Posted by 28lx
Originally Posted by rl11
I've long coveted an 84m, and figured 'kimber roulette' was just a few unhappy, picky curmudgeons. I saved up my pennies and after perusing all the online outlets found the classic select that had walnut that met my standards, and ordered it.

[Linked Image]

First impression was great. What a well designed, balanced, and aesthetically pleasing rifle.

I loaded the magazine and started jacking rounds through. Huge gouge in each brass. Sticking my pinky in I could feel a burr the size of a Volkswagen on the feed rail. Whatever. Annoying, but not a deal breaker.

I took the gun in to my smith to have the rail polished. He stuck his flashlight in the chamber and found this-

[Linked Image]

I have no idea what happened, but it's mind blowing to me that the chamber on a $1300 rifle can look like that.

Customer service was somewhat helpful, my rifle is back in Yonkers, and I've got a hunt in Alaska next month that I'll be taking my Ruger on.

I'm sure the vast majority of their rifles perform as they should, but obviously from my sample they've got some serious quality control issues.




Good Luck! Here is a Kimber chamber thst is (within Kimber specs per Sergio)
[img:center]http://[Linked Image][/img]


That's just sad.



Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 201
B
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
B
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 201
I purchased one of the first Montana's off the line in 270 WSM. Never shot well, worked on it off and on for a few years to get it within 1.5 MOA. Bedding, barrel lapping, feeding work, etc. Unchambered a long load and the bullet stuck in the lands one day in the field. All I had to remove it was an arrow shaft. The shaft fit perfectly and dropped right down the barrel to within 6 inches of the throat and stopped. Obviously the barrel had considerable variation on inside diameter, and in the wrong direction. Tight throat and loose muzzle explains why I had such a hard time getting it to shoot. It's still sitting in the safe but no confidence to take it out.

Here is my question. Is it worth the gamble to spend the money to rebarrel? My gunsmith advised against it saying in his experience with them it's 50/50 if a new barrel makes the poor ones shoot like one would expect. He advised to sell it and start with a more consistent performing action. Thoughts or experience from anyone?


Brad Watkins Custom Knives
www.facebook.com/watkinsknives/
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,926
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,926
Originally Posted by Bullwhacker
I purchased one of the first Montana's off the line in 270 WSM. Never shot well, worked on it off and on for a few years to get it within 1.5 MOA. Bedding, barrel lapping, feeding work, etc. Unchambered a long load and the bullet stuck in the lands one day in the field. All I had to remove it was an arrow shaft. The shaft fit perfectly and dropped right down the barrel to within 6 inches of the throat and stopped. Obviously the barrel had considerable variation on inside diameter, and in the wrong direction. Tight throat and loose muzzle explains why I had such a hard time getting it to shoot. It's still sitting in the safe but no confidence to take it out.

Here is my question. Is it worth the gamble to spend the money to rebarrel? My gunsmith advised against it saying in his experience with them it's 50/50 if a new barrel makes the poor ones shoot like one would expect. He advised to sell it and start with a more consistent performing action. Thoughts or experience from anyone?


Find another gunsmith.

David

IC B3

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 22,274
Originally Posted by Bullwhacker
I purchased one of the first Montana's off the line in 270 WSM. Never shot well, worked on it off and on for a few years to get it within 1.5 MOA. Bedding, barrel lapping, feeding work, etc. Unchambered a long load and the bullet stuck in the lands one day in the field. All I had to remove it was an arrow shaft. The shaft fit perfectly and dropped right down the barrel to within 6 inches of the throat and stopped. Obviously the barrel had considerable variation on inside diameter, and in the wrong direction. Tight throat and loose muzzle explains why I had such a hard time getting it to shoot. It's still sitting in the safe but no confidence to take it out.

Here is my question. Is it worth the gamble to spend the money to rebarrel? My gunsmith advised against it saying in his experience with them it's 50/50 if a new barrel makes the poor ones shoot like one would expect. He advised to sell it and start with a more consistent performing action. Thoughts or experience from anyone?


send it to Pac-Nor. It won't be cheap but it will work when they are through with it.


"...the designer of the .270 Ingwe cartridge!..."

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,252
A
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,252
Only a sample of one but no issues here.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,386
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,386
Originally Posted by Bullwhacker
I purchased one of the first Montana's off the line in 270 WSM. Never shot well, worked on it off and on for a few years to get it within 1.5 MOA. Bedding, barrel lapping, feeding work, etc. Unchambered a long load and the bullet stuck in the lands one day in the field. All I had to remove it was an arrow shaft. The shaft fit perfectly and dropped right down the barrel to within 6 inches of the throat and stopped. Obviously the barrel had considerable variation on inside diameter, and in the wrong direction. Tight throat and loose muzzle explains why I had such a hard time getting it to shoot. It's still sitting in the safe but no confidence to take it out.

Here is my question. Is it worth the gamble to spend the money to rebarrel? My gunsmith advised against it saying in his experience with them it's 50/50 if a new barrel makes the poor ones shoot like one would expect. He advised to sell it and start with a more consistent performing action. Thoughts or experience from anyone?



Sent mine to IT&D for a rebarrel it shoots great now.

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 1
P
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
P
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 1
Tikkas are cheaper and shoot as well or better.



P


Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.

~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~

Member #547
Join date 3/09/2001
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,625
Likes: 1
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,625
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Tikkas are cheaper and shoot as well or better.



P


There is no comparison between the feel of a Tikka and a Montana.

A few Tikkas have passed through my hands. Never really bothered to shoot one.


FÜCK Jeff_O!

MAGA
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,931
Likes: 15
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,931
Likes: 15
Why would you, after holding a montana?.....

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 22,736
Originally Posted by WhelenAway
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Tikkas are cheaper and shoot as well or better.



P


There is no comparison between the feel of a Tikka and a Montana.

A few Tikkas have passed through my hands. Never really bothered to shoot one.


I'm not interested in the "feel", only the performance. As I think back to the numerous Montanas I owned, there were a few that were great out of the box.
There were some that were stinkers too - in fact all 4 Kimber .257's were bad.
Never tried a .260 cause a buddy had one that was ridiculously awful.
So while we see some talented fellows here can tweak a Montana into a performer, the lowly Tikka just performs right out of the box - at half the price.
An upgrade to the Tikka T3 is a Sako 85 Classic if you just can't stand copolymer stocks. In between is a Tikka Hunter with blue and walnut.
Its all good and great to have choices.

Last edited by bigwhoop; 07/18/15.

My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,103
Likes: 6
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 46,103
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by Canazes9
Originally Posted by Bullwhacker
Tight throat and loose muzzle explains why I had such a hard time getting it to shoot.


Find another gunsmith.

David


I agree with David.

As far as a tight throat, are you sure you don't have carbon build-up in the barrel? Right in front of the chamber is where it would be.



A wise man is frequently humbled.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,252
A
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,252
Originally Posted by WhelenAway
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Tikkas are cheaper and shoot as well or better.



P


There is no comparison between the feel of a Tikka and a Montana.

A few Tikkas have passed through my hands. Never really bothered to shoot one.


Unfortunately I agree with this. I have had 5-6 Tikkas, a 595, 695 and several T3s. Calibers from .223 to .300 win mag to include a 6.5 swede, two .270s and even had a T3 surgically altered to a 280AI that shot lights out. I want to like them but for some reason always send them down the road. Model 70s are my favorite which makes the lightweight Montana a no brainer. After reading all the spotty reviews spanning several years I finally rolled the dice with the 84L and now wish I had done it sooner.

I still recommend the T3 to anyone who is interested and will probably own another.

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,931
Likes: 15
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 22,931
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by bigwhoop

Never tried a .260 cause a buddy had one that was ridiculously awful.


One? That's a HELL of a reason.....

Maybe if'n ya had a 'buddy' with a good one, you wouldn't be so fugged up.

Page 3 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

627 members (007FJ, 160user, 1beaver_shooter, 12344mag, 1minute, 219DW, 64 invisible), 2,890 guests, and 1,256 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,482
Posts18,490,208
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.168s Queries: 54 (0.010s) Memory: 0.9151 MB (Peak: 1.0182 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 01:44:57 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS