|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,822
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,822 |
I have run across some WW Roberts brass that will not fit my shellholder. Upon examination I found the diameter of the extractor groove to be larger than the brass that fits. This is pre +P brass FYI, was the groove diameter larger on early brass and later standardized? Anyone else encounter this situation?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 810
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 810 |
Nope. All mine has had the same case head as 7mm Mauser, 30-06, 45ACP, etc.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,822
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,822 |
You failed to understand the question, I'm not talking about the case head diameter which is the same. What I am talking about is the diameter at the bottom of the extractor groove. the cases that will not fit my shellholder have a larger diameter here.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,480 Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,480 Likes: 2 |
One of my reloading books had a note that some brass had different extractor groove. I think maybe an old Lyman. All new brass is the same I think.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,822
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,822 |
You are correct, new brass whether +P or not all extractor groove diameters are the same. I have been roloading .257 Roberts for nearly 40 yrs. and this is the first I had encountered this. Needless to say I scrapped those few pieces of brass.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,144 Likes: 1
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,144 Likes: 1 |
It would be pretty easy to relieve the inside lip of the shell holder just enough to accommodate brass with the shallow extractor groove.
DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,625
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,625 |
I had the same issue, and it must have been common at one time. An RCBS #11 shell holder solved the problem. Found that info in an old Speer manual. All my current 257 and 7x57 brass fits in the #3.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 810
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 810 |
The groove in 7mm Mauser S&B brass is larger than any other 7mm brass I've bought or been given. Privi Part. brass is standard with modern brass.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,271
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,271 |
I had the same issue, and it must have been common at one time. An RCBS #11 shell holder solved the problem. Found that info in an old Speer manual. All my current 257 and 7x57 brass fits in the #3. +1 If I remember right, some of the old shell holder charts gave two different numbers for the 257
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 623
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 623 |
I had the same issue, and it must have been common at one time. An RCBS #11 shell holder solved the problem. Found that info in an old Speer manual. All my current 257 and 7x57 brass fits in the #3. +1 If I remember right, some of the old shell holder charts gave two different numbers for the 257 I've found this too. Just don't mix brands of brass in the same run. I necked some 6mm Remington up to 257 when I couldn't find 257 Roberts brass. It takes a #11. I only use it for 75 grain Sierras so it's always separate. I've also found instances where a Lee holder didn't work with some 7.62 Nato, but an RCBS did. Just different manufacturers dimensions stacking up.
|
|
|
|
549 members (10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 10gaugemag, 1234, 12344mag, 58 invisible),
2,272
guests, and
1,298
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,392
Posts18,488,767
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|