24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
J
Campfire Regular
OP Online Content
Campfire Regular
J
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,552
My buddy has some really nice reloading equipment. And has the ability to really see actual results. He has moved to a GemPro 250 electronic scale. They get really good reviews on their accuracy. But not so good reviews on their longevity. I've been using an archaic beam scale for 30 years. And a cheap Lyman one at that.

Wanted some opinions on the best and most accurate method of weighing charges for extreme low ES and Long Range.


Please God, give me some good tags this year....
GB1

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Beam scale is about as accurate as you can get for consistency. The objection to them is that it takes a bit more time.

Why agonize about weights? For years the most accurate shooters, those in benchrest competition, dumped their loads out of powder measures. Unweighed. You'd be hard put to beat them with a sporting rifle.


Used to be bobski, member since '01
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,523
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,523
Not a fan of the electronic scales. I like my RCBS 5-0-2 and tuned Redding #2 balances better than my Gempro. I get inconsistent readings with mine, not huge values but enough to be bothersome. My balance on the other hand seems to repeat very well and when used with an Omega trickler I can get three perfect (+-.05gr) charges per minute for my long range ammo I load single stage. I think I'd need to spend quite a bit more than the Gempro costs to get the consistency I want. You can get a Parker tuned RCBS 10-10 balance for a lot less than a good electronic scale and it is as accurate and pretty much as fast to use. My .02c.

If it has to be a digital, the Acculab 123 was well thought of. There are probably others. I think that Accurateshooter.com has reviewed several models but I don't remember seeing an independent comparison of several models at the same time regarding performance.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,849
Likes: 3
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,849
Likes: 3
A beam scale can be pretty sensitive. On a typical 308 charge of 45 grains of Varget my old RCBS 10-10 will show detectable movement with the addition of one kernel. That's assuming I'm wearing my reading glasses, Varget kernels are pretty small.

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098
Originally Posted by mathman
A beam scale can be pretty sensitive. On a typical 308 charge of 45 grains of Varget my old RCBS 10-10 will show detectable movement with the addition of one kernel. That's assuming I'm wearing my reading glasses, Varget kernels are pretty small.


Ditto. I wouldn't be without my 10-10. 30 years old and counting. I tried a couple different electronic scales along the way and sold them pretty quickly.

I would spend money on a first rate powder measure before going crazy on the scales.


"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz
"Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
IC B2

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,561
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,561
Originally Posted by Bob338
Beam scale is about as accurate as you can get for consistency. The objection to them is that it takes a bit more time.

Why agonize about weights? For years the most accurate shooters, those in benchrest competition, dumped their loads out of powder measures. Unweighed. You'd be hard put to beat them with a sporting rifle.


I believe benchrest shooters tend to gravitate toward powders that meter well unlike some of the ones I use.

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,437
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,437
RCBS 10-10


μολὼν λαβέ
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098
I just heard RCBS is discontinuing the 505 and 10-10 scales. True? frown


"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz
"Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,532
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,532
Likes: 2
Yes, 'tis true.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,219
E
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
E
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,219
I use a PACT. I use to double check weights with my 5-0-5 but haven't done so in years.

IC B3

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,697
So what will RCBS sell? Just the 5-0-2?


“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
― Patrick Rothfuss, The Wise Man's Fear
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 543
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 543
There is a gentleman over on the accurateshooter.com forums who goes by "sparker". He tuned up a Redding #2 scale for me a few years ago, and made a big difference in how it performed. He is highly regarded on that forum, if you want to do a search on him. My personal experience with him was excellent. If anyone is thinking of staying with a beam balance scale, I would recommend a chat with him.

Steve

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,871
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,871
Likes: 1
Personally lean toward the mechanical side that I can check, tune up if ever needed, zero out, and don't need power or batteries. My 1960's Lyman balance responds to a single flake or kernel of powder.


1Minute
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,548
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,548
Originally Posted by 1minute
Personally lean toward the mechanical side that I can check, tune up if ever needed, zero out, and don't need power or batteries. My 1960's Lyman balance responds to a single flake or kernel of powder.

Is yours an M5? That's what I have made by Ohaus for Lyman. I think Ohaus made the 1010 for RCBS as the older versions look almost identical to the Lyman M5.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,871
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29,871
Likes: 1
Nothing to identify mine. At one time there was a paper label on the oil bath end, but it's long since fallen off. About 1962 vintage.


1Minute
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,819
G
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,819
Started out with and RCBS, tried a couple of the electronic scales and did not like the need for re-zeroing. Went back to an Ohaus 10-10.

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,548
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,548
Originally Posted by 1minute
Nothing to identify mine. At one time there was a paper label on the oil bath end, but it's long since fallen off. About 1962 vintage.

Here's a few pics of a Lyman M5:

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Attached Images
Lyman M5 Scale pic 1.jpg (48.96 KB, 639 downloads)
Lyman M5 Scale pic 3.jpg (48.42 KB, 591 downloads)
Lyman M5 Scale pic 4.jpg (48.07 KB, 585 downloads)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
1
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
10-10 for the win/win

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,914
2
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
2
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,914
Originally Posted by mathman
A beam scale can be pretty sensitive. On a typical 308 charge of 45 grains of Varget my old RCBS 10-10 will show detectable movement with the addition of one kernel. That's assuming I'm wearing my reading glasses, Varget kernels are pretty small.


+1. Spot on,Sir.

From time to time I clean the little pivot point stones as well as a gentle scrape with a razor across the "V"s of the beam itself to keep the beam ultra free in its movement.

Hope I described that right !

Also have a PACT digital but do a final trickle using the 10-10.

Damn thing gotta be 35-40 years old.

I also have an exact designated spot on my bench for the scale. Can't remember the last time I had to adjust its zero.


Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 685
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 685
Don't dismiss one of the old Redding oil dampened balance beam scales. They can get a little squirrely and and be slow to settle down with just 3 in 1 or gun oil.....but, try replacing the oil with something more viscous....STP and RCBS case lube work fine and really speed things up. I tried a couple electronic scales and gave up on them. Maybe the new ones are better....dunno.


You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

575 members (1beaver_shooter, 007FJ, 17CalFan, 06hunter59, 12344mag, 1lessdog, 59 invisible), 2,466 guests, and 1,282 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,060
Posts18,482,382
Members73,959
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.143s Queries: 56 (0.016s) Memory: 0.9050 MB (Peak: 1.0363 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-01 19:30:23 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS