|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 825
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 825 |
Hi Guys, just bought a bolt-action 375 H&H. I will be taking it to Africa next summer for Cape Buffalo. Any scope advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 347
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 347 |
Only Cape Buffalo?
If not, 2-10X
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,826
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,826 |
Maker of the Frankenstud Sling Keeper
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,038
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,038 |
I use the Leupold VX3 2.5-8x36mm on my 375 H&H for Steenbok up to Buffalo.
Frank
"I don't know what there is about buffalo that frightens me so.....He looks like he hates you personally. He looks like you owe him money."
Robert Ruark, Horn of the Hunter, 1953
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
Get a Schmidt& Bender.
I'll take a fixed power Leopold over their variables on a 375 any day of the week.
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5,524
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5,524 |
I put a Leupold VX-3 2.5-8x36 on my Ruger Alaskan in 375, lots of eye relief.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,159
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,159 |
I put a Leupold VX-6, 1-6x24, 30mm tube with firedot reticle, on my .416 Rigby It worked well.
donsm70
Life Member...Safari Club International Life Member...Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation Life Member...Keystone Country Elk Alliance Life Member...National Rifle Association
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 78,300 |
^^^^^^^^^^^ This......duh.
"...the left considers you vermin, and they'll kill you given the chance..." Bristoe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,168
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,168 |
VX3 1.5-5x20 is the obvious choice.
If it will fit the action the 4x33 fx2 is pretty nice choice for person who likes the simplicity of a fixed power. It seems to get over looked in favor of the 2.5X, maybe because people feel the forward bell won't leave enough scope to mount on a 375. It fits well enough on my 375 Ruger.
4x is low enough power that I can shoot both eyes open, so it will work up close and its enough scope for me to ring a 6" gong at 300 until recoil tells me to stop.
The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this Republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. Coolidge
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608 |
He posted over on the Big Bores and this is what I wrote: Good evening. I am sure you will get a ton of responses but it boils down to how much you want to spend. For Cape buffalo, THE scope in my view is the Leupold 1.75X6X32 (E) with a heavy duplex. Buffalo at 25 yards and a kudu at a lasered 352. j
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,367
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 23,367 |
I've used open sights for buff, I've used 3-10 x 50. A scope is handy peering into the shadows tracking them during mid day in the thick jess bush and other thick stuff.
20mm leaves a FOV a bit too restricted for my taste. 32mm is fine. I always thought a red dot sight would be good, but never wanted to do the durability testing to get the confidence that it would not crap out at the wrong moment.
"The Democrat Party looks like Titanic survivors. Partying and celebrating one moment, and huddled in lifeboats freezing the next". Hatari 2017
"Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side, kid." Han Solo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
I tend to be a fixed, 4x power scope guy on my hunting rifles. A 'long ranger' might get a 6x, and that is 'plenty big power' to me. So 2.5X has never felt like a handicap or left me wanting on my 375 and my M70 wears one with the Burris label presently. I have Weaver 2.5xs on the lighter 9.3 and 45-70 Ruger #1-S and prefer that version of a 2.5X scope over the bigger Burris, or the Leupold 2.5X which is on a Marlin 45-70. (The Leupold has the smallest FOV among the three.)
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 224
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 224 |
I put a Leupold VX-6, 1-6x24, 30mm tube with firedot reticle, on my .416 Rigby It worked well.
donsm70 I put one of these on my Sako .375 and I really like it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 825
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 825 |
Guys, thanks for the input. I really appreciate it
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565 |
VX3 1.5-5x Trijicon Accupoint 1-4x VXR 1.25-4X
A fixed 2.5X wouldn't bother me a bit....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,669
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,669 |
I've got a nice VX-II 1x4 Leupold for sale. It's matte with a duplex.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 197
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 197 |
vx3 1.5x20
Big medicine for Cape Buff.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 96
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 96 |
Swarovski 1.7-10x42 z6i would be my first choice.
Jay Wiggins
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,114
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,114 |
I have the Swarovski PH 1.5-6x42 on my DG rifles (.416 and .375) with crosshairs, and an illuminated circle with red dot reticles. They have served me well, but are no longer in production. I have also employed the Swarovski Z6i 1.7-10 x 42 with the same reticle with good results. The lower power of the magnification range is far more important than the upper power when hunting buff. The illumination really stands out, considering the hide of the buff is basically black. i highly recommend an illuminated reticle.
While I have never personally used the 1.5-5x20 VX3, it has an excellent reputation and is, I believe, available with an illuminated reticle. If you consider the Swaro too bulky or too expensive, the VX3 will do just fine. By comparison, I would expect the Swaro to provide a better image in low light conditions. If leopard is on the menu during the same hunt, I would definitely choose the Swaro if you intend to hunt leopard as well.
Give the Meopta line a look. They used to make a 1.5-6x42 with an illuminated reticle and 30mm tube at a "reasonable" price. I don't know if it's still in production, but I have some experience with Meopta optics and they are first rate.
Do not neglect the mounts! You need QD mounts so you can use your iron sights if need be. I have tried multiple varieties of QD mounts and have settled on the Recknagel mounts from Germany as my first preference.
Enjoy your hunt!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,697
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,697 |
Leupold is making a fixed 3X out of their custom shop...I have one NIB with a heavy duplex. Been thinking of mounting it on my Montana .375. Might be a good choice. Bob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565 |
The new ones with heavy D are nice.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,330
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,330 |
I have a Leupold 1.75X6X32 on my 416 Remington Model 70. Sent it to Leupold Custom Shop and had them put a German #4 reticle in it. Have used it for 3 nyati's - works great.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,425
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,425 |
I've got a couple VX3 3.5-10 x 40s and a 3-9 Zeiss Diavari on mine, but a 1.75-6 or 2.5-8 VX3 wouldn't hurt anything. Whether they would help anything is debatable. Stopped a charging buffalo with a 2.5-8 on a .458 once.
A .375 is sort of a do everything rifle, may as well put your idea of a do everything scope on it.
Life begins at 40. Recoil begins at "Over 40" Coincidence? I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,245
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 46,245 |
Completed my first Safari in the low bush veld Mopani thorn thickets with a 1.5-5 Leupold, longest shot was a nice Impala ram at 151 yards facing near straight on.
Plenty of magnification for that, I was using a 400 Whelen firing 400 gr Woodleigh Weldcore bullets at 2255 fps.
Enjoy your Buffalo hunt, I think about mine several times daily.
Trump Won!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,905
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,905 |
This is the best advice, the 1.75X6X42 would be perfection. Great optical clarity and resolution and reliability
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,756
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 11,756 |
I ha a Leupold 2.5 - 8 on my .375 in Africa
NRA Patron
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,448
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,448 |
If you are interested in a scope that is usable at close range with both eyes open, it is best to try sighting thru the scope with both eyes open. I have found that some are able to use a 2 or 3 power scope but I personally have a difficult time sighting with both eyes open unless the scope will go down very very close to a true 1x. Best to check before purchasing if possible.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
This is the best advice, the 1.75X6X42 would be perfection. Great optical clarity and resolution and reliability Best Ive ever seen.
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 360
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 360 |
He posted over on the Big Bores and this is what I wrote: Good evening. I am sure you will get a ton of responses but it boils down to how much you want to spend. For Cape buffalo, THE scope in my view is the Leupold 1.75X6X32 (E) with a heavy duplex. Buffalo at 25 yards and a kudu at a lasered 352. j +1
I hunt, not to kill, but in order not to have played golf....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 193
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 193 |
Swarovski 1.7-10x42 z6i would be my first choice. +1 on the Swaro. It's versatile - for Cape Buffalo at short range to other critters at longer distances. Pricey indeed, but excellent IMHO.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,281
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,281 |
Leupold is making a fixed 3X out of their custom shop...I have one NIB with a heavy duplex. Been thinking of mounting it on my Montana .375. Might be a good choice. Bob This is the scope I put on my .375. FWIW, I killed a Kudu with it in South Africa at a lasered 240 yards and a Caribou in Alaska at a lasered 250. I had a lot going through my mind as I was preparing to pull the trigger, but at no point did I think, "Dang, I wish I had more magnification."
Al
Spend your life wisely.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,088
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,088 |
I've used several different scopes on a couple of .375's, from the fixed 3x20 Leupold to a 3-9x. After the 3x worked fine on large animals up close to others as small as bushbuck and impala at 250-300 yards, it's now on my .375.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,496
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,496 |
I don't like the variable scope with small front ends like the 1.5-5 Leupold. They are too dark. The straight 2.5 is very good but I prefer the a Leupold 3-9 or 2.5-8 much better. A heavy scope on a hard kicker is trouble.
Last edited by RinB; 09/16/16.
“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”. Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,496
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,496 |
Tony Arino Sanchez says 3-9.
“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”. Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,105
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,105 |
My experience: the smaller 20 mm objectives (I used a 1.5-5x Vari-X lll for awhile) are noticeably darker in the shadows and at either end of the day-too much so for my tastes.
I used a 1.75-6x Leupold in Namibia and found the power range ideal for me but even better in the grey-brown bush was the heavy duplex in it. I've also used the German 4a and liked it in those situations as well.
A lot of scopes will work but IMO stay away from a fine reticle for use on a big black animal that will probably be in the bush.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,340
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,340 |
I have a Leupold 1.75X6X32 on my 416 Remington Model 70. Sent it to Leupold Custom Shop and had them put a German #4 reticle in it. Have used it for 3 nyati's - works great. I bought the same scope with a heavy duplex reticle, wanted a German #4 but that's not an option. When the scope came I mounted it and when trying to bore sight the windage turret didn't work. I sent it back to Leupold and asked how much it would cost to have a German #4 installed. Customer service told me since I had to send the scope back, and they had to disassemble it there would be no charge, so I got what I wanted. It is my favorite scope and now I know I won't have to buy a new scope if and when I get a DG rifle.
Don't roll those bloodshot eyes at me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611 |
If I had one I would take donsm70's advice. powdr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,998
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,998 |
For DG you want a max at the low end of probably 3X. You may end up with fast close shots on something that is moving and it may be moving towards you. The top end can be anything but doesn't need to be much over 5X. Weight is a concern because you will be walking a lot and also hard kickers with heavy scopes put a lot of strain on mounts. If you ever plan on hunting cats or even in thick jess an illuminated reticle can be very nice. I prefer low powered variables but a fixed of 3X or lower would work fine. My 375 wears a 2.5-8 Leupold or a 1.5-6 Kahles with illuminated reticle both in Tally QR's. A heavy reticle is fine just make sure it doesn't cover up too much for that 350 yard shot at wildebeest and is not too busy. If you can wait until the Dallas or SCI shows you can look at a lot of good optics and talk to folks who know what they are talking about. Not that the folks here don't but the guy behind the counter of your LGS might not be the best place to get advice. Have fun on your safari!
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844 |
My experience: the smaller 20 mm objectives (I used a 1.5-5x Vari-X lll for awhile) are noticeably darker in the shadows and at either end of the day-too much so for my tastes.
I used a 1.75-6x Leupold in Namibia and found the power range ideal for me but even better in the grey-brown bush was the heavy duplex in it. I've also used the German 4a and liked it in those situations as well.
A lot of scopes will work but IMO stay away from a fine reticle for use on a big black animal that will probably be in the bush.
Any preference between HD and German 4 in that scope? Thanks RM
"An archer sees how far he can be from a target and still hit it, a bowhunter sees how close he can get before he shoots." It is certainly easy to use that same line of thinking with firearms. -- Unknown
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,105
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,105 |
RevMike, no; I'd take either in those circumstances. They are the continental and American versions of the same concept and IMO both suit the purpose equally well.
I had thought the HD could not be as precise as a "finer" reticle, yet in 2007 shot my smallest 100-yd group ever with the HD and a......375 H&H! Three shots overlayed at .300".
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844 |
Thanks. I have a HD on a 1.5-5 but was thinking that a German 4 on a 1.75-6 might be a good for quick shots in thick stuff, especially in near dark conditions.
That's pretty precise regardless of reticle!
"An archer sees how far he can be from a target and still hit it, a bowhunter sees how close he can get before he shoots." It is certainly easy to use that same line of thinking with firearms. -- Unknown
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608 |
My experience: the smaller 20 mm objectives (I used a 1.5-5x Vari-X lll for awhile) are noticeably darker in the shadows and at either end of the day-too much so for my tastes.
I used a 1.75-6x Leupold in Namibia and found the power range ideal for me but even better in the grey-brown bush was the heavy duplex in it. I've also used the German 4a and liked it in those situations as well.
A lot of scopes will work but IMO stay away from a fine reticle for use on a big black animal that will probably be in the bush.
Any preference between HD and German 4 in that scope? Thanks RM Mike; I used the HD because I believe the #4 was not available in the 1.75X6. The #4 is available in the 1.5X5X20 but I think only with the ill reticle which is what I have on my 416R. j
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844 |
Mike, I used the HD because I believe the #4 was not available in the 1.75X6. The #4 is available in the 1.5X5X20 but I think only with the ill reticle which is what I have on my 416R. j The new VX3i only comes in regular duplex at this point. Any other reticle is a switch. If the HD and German 4 are more or less a toss up, I think I'll have the reticle switched to the German 4 since I already have the HD on the 1.5-5. What I'm looking for as well is a bit more light (32mm v 20mm) for those late evening porkers that show up when there's about 2 minutes of ambient light left. RM
"An archer sees how far he can be from a target and still hit it, a bowhunter sees how close he can get before he shoots." It is certainly easy to use that same line of thinking with firearms. -- Unknown
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608 |
The HD (or #$) really help in that regard, Mike. I'd take the 32mm all day long over the 20
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,690
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,690 |
I will be heading to Zimbabwe for buffalo and sable next year. My 416 Rem M70 will wear the 1.5-5X Leupold I took on M70 375 H&H chasing brown bear hunt this past spring. It will also be on the same 375 in 2018 chasing brown bear again.
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4,844 |
The HD (or #$) really help in that regard, Mike. I'd take the 32mm all day long over the 20 This past spring, very late in the evening, I crept up on a feeder that had a young pig near it. I was a little over twenty yards away, but because I was kneeling on the ground in the shadows, and the black pig was rooting in front of some palmetto, all I could see were the tan edges of his ears moving. Had I been in the stand, fifteen feet in the air, there probably would have been enough ambient light flowing into the 20mm objective to have taken a shot, but in the shadows I simply couldn't make out exactly what part of the pig I was looking at. So I passed. I was carrying Ingwe's old "big rifle" with the VX3 1.5-5 HD duplex that I put on it. A little more objective, as well as (hopefully) Leupold's new low light lens coating, and I might have had enough definition to take the shot. My only indecision right now is whether or not to have an HD or G4 reticle installed on the 1.75-6x32 when it arrives. I'll need to make up my mind soon, though, as I expect the scope will be here sometime next week.
"An archer sees how far he can be from a target and still hit it, a bowhunter sees how close he can get before he shoots." It is certainly easy to use that same line of thinking with firearms. -- Unknown
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091 |
I have VX-3 1.75-6x32 and 1.5-5x20, like them both. The Victory 1.5-6x42 is a big scope, 20 oz in Warne QD's. But it's super bright and the glass is first rate, great is fading light. I've not been on Safari, not sure which scope I'd use. Would probably have both Victory and 1.75-6 in QD's. M-70 NH .375 H&H, 21", flutted by Karl, NECG irons, 7#, 14 oz w/o scope. DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578 |
I have tried to use the 20mm objective Leupolds, but I need more light.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608 |
Dirt: that Victory is a SERIOUS scope for low light hunting and would be my choice for a cat blind.
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091 |
Jorge,
Not sure how it compares to the Swaro, the reticle is SFP, visible in low light.
I had a VX-6 1-6x24 #4 Fire dot. It was a great scope, but at 300 yds. that reticle was sorta thick for precise shooting; I sold it.
With the VX-6, I would recommend std. duplex and Fire dot. That duplex is very visible and would be better for all around shooting including long shots.
The .375 H&H can be a LR gun, in fact does pretty well in that regard. So, for genl. use, scope choice needs to account for that possibility.
DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608 |
I'm sure it's the equal of any Swaro. Swaros are great, BUT they suffer from very thin reticles that I think negate their great glass. I have a Z6 that even with their thicker reticle, it still tougher to see than a standard Leupold HD.
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091 |
I'm sure it's the equal of any Swaro. Swaros are great, BUT they suffer from very thin reticles that I think negate their great glass. I have a Z6 that even with their thicker reticle, it still tougher to see than a standard Leupold HD. I have a Z5 and a Z3. The 5 was so bad, I sent it back for a #4, which is better, still not that heavy. The 3 is pretty fine but not that bad. Don't have a 6. A VX-6 2-12x42 is another thought, great duplex and very good glass. I have two, just not on DG type rifles. Good ER. DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,608 |
My next scope will be a VX6 for sure. Frankly after all these years, I'm perfectly content with a 2.5X8X36 Leupold w the B&C reticle. Worked like a CHAMP on that elk!
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239 |
jorgeI, never thought I'd say it, but the B&C that sits on my MCWhorter 7-08 works like a champ too out too 500 yards. Hashes match up perfectly at 3,4,450, and 500.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,091 |
I have VX-3 1.75-6x32 and 1.5-5x20, like them both. The Victory 1.5-6x42 is a big scope, 20 oz in Warne QD's. But it's super bright and the glass is first rate, great is fading light. I've not been on Safari, not sure which scope I'd use. Would probably have both Victory and 1.75-6 in QD's. M-70 NH .375 H&H, 21", flutted by Karl, NECG irons, 7#, 14 oz w/o scope. DF Correction. 7#, 12 oz without scope. DF
|
|
|
|
621 members (007FJ, 10Glocks, 1lessdog, 222Sako, 21, 12344mag, 66 invisible),
2,428
guests, and
1,219
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,413
Posts18,470,470
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|