Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Kerry: Media Would 'Do Us All a Service' If They Didn't Cover Terrorism as Much

Kerry: Media Would 'Do Us All a Service' If They Didn't Cover Terrorism as Much

During his first official visit to Bangladesh, Secretary of State John Kerry held a press conference and addressed the threat of terrorism.

Kerry offered a novel way to combat terrorism, suggesting that the media would “do us all a service” if they didn’t cover it “quite as much.”

“No country is immune from terrorism," Kerry said at a press availability in Dhaka, Bangladesh, on Monday. "It’s easy to terrorize. Government and law enforcement have to be correct 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. But if you decide one day you’re going to be a terrorist and you’re willing to kill yourself, you can go out and kill some people. You can make some noise. Perhaps the media would do us all a service if they didn’t cover it quite as much. People wouldn’t know what’s going on.”

It would certainly take the pressure off of B. Hussein Obama, and his cronies that want to import more of those followers of the Religion of Peace ignorance.

Kerry and Biden are in close competition for "jackass of the year award".

I don't like Kerry, but he's right on this one, and not just for terrorism, but mass shootings as well. Not calling for a news blackout, but the media in this country bemoans and wails in the aftermath of an attack on a scale the world has seldom seen. In the meantime, more people die in traffic accidents during the first days after such an attack with little notice.

In a fight with another person you don't want to make victim noises as they motivate and encourage your opponent. The same is true for a nation. The media should report the facts, but avoid wall to wall coverage of every detail and every weeping person they can find as doing so actually glorifies the effectiveness of the attackers in the warped minds of those who want to do the same. The result is you get more attacks.

Every once in a while someone from the Left says what they are really thinking. That's how you know they're idiots. They think they're saying something new, when it's the same-old same-old.

In this case, Kerry let slip that they really don't want a free press. They want a press that gives the news they want given, and hides the news they want hidden.

Steve.

It would certainly take the pressure off of B. Hussein Obama, and his cronies that want to import more of those followers of the Religion of Peace.

I don't like Kerry, but he's right on this one, and not just for terrorism, but mass shootings as well. Not calling for a news blackout, but the media in this country bemoans and wails in the aftermath of an attack on a scale the world has seldom seen. In the meantime, more people die in traffic accidents during the first days after such an attack with little notice.

In a fight with another person you don't want to make victim noises as they motivate and encourage your opponent. The same is true for a nation. The media should report the facts, but avoid wall to wall coverage of every detail and every weeping person they can find as doing so actually glorifies the effectiveness of the attackers in the warped minds of those who want to do the same. The result is you get more attacks.

We don't need to know what everybody involved had for breakfast, but we absolutely need to know who's pulling this sh*t and who they work for.

We also need to know about the innocent victims so we can stay resolved to burn the terrorists in their holes at every opportunity.

If we ever become complacent about terror, we're done.

Who is "us all"?

I don't like Kerry, but he's right on this one, and not just for terrorism, but mass shootings as well. Not calling for a news blackout, but the media in this country bemoans and wails in the aftermath of an attack on a scale the world has seldom seen. In the meantime, more people die in traffic accidents during the first days after such an attack with little notice.

In a fight with another person you don't want to make victim noises as they motivate and encourage your opponent. The same is true for a nation. The media should report the facts, but avoid wall to wall coverage of every detail and every weeping person they can find as doing so actually glorifies the effectiveness of the attackers in the warped minds of those who want to do the same. The result is you get more attacks.

We don't want to be complacent, but we should take such attacks in prospective given the number of people who die on the roads every day, or those killed by gang violence.

People wouldn’t know what’s going on.”

Maybe you didn't read all of what Kerry said. His last line was. "People wouldn't know what's going on". And that is his purpose: essentially censure. Censure is never right, particularly when people are being murdered, often in mass.

I'll agree that the media does not cover anything like this well, mostly because their journalism and journalistic ethics simply suck. And it always comes around to blaming the gun. But it has to be reported. Just better, but that may well be a bridge too far for the New Pravda.

In that same vein, limiting the media's over-the-top-wailing for days would serve the public interest well.

I don't like Kerry, but he's right on this one, and not just for terrorism, but mass shootings as well. Not calling for a news blackout, but the media in this country bemoans and wails in the aftermath of an attack on a scale the world has seldom seen. In the meantime, more people die in traffic accidents during the first days after such an attack with little notice.

Limiting is a tremendously dangerous precedent that equated to invalidating the first amendment. The one 2A was included to protect.

I think not. Let them wail and silence them in the marketplace not at the cost of lost freedoms.

Not possible to black out the news in such a way today, but there is precedents where the public good is served by limiting the public's right to know.

Who died and made you king?

If the public has a "RIGHT-to-know," then they have a right. The limitation of rights is an act of deception and sabotage against another.

I'll take care of me and my own based on the information that I have. You or anyone else limiting that information is an act of sabotage against my survival.

Those who have no information cannot make their own decision about its usefulness.

No one in America needs the MSM deciding for them what is good for them to know. No one.