Jill the Pill is trying to extend her 15 minutes of fame to 30 minutes. Her meter is running and she is out of nickels. She is that yapping student in class that just likes to hear themselves talk.
I wonder what became of the warrant for her arrest in the NoDak vandalism event? Here is her photo spray painting a piece of construction equipment.
she still doesn't get it! she beats on the democracy drum,just can't get through their heads its a constitutional republic.
the consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded. Robert E Lee ~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
One-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified from an unprecedented statewide recount of presidential election results because of problems with ballots.
Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.
Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.
“It’s not good,” conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit.
"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical."-- Thomas Jefferson
One-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified from an unprecedented statewide recount of presidential election results because of problems with ballots.
Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.
Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.
“It’s not good,” conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit.
So what? They chalked up a few too many for Hil on election night? Or they are trying to add in some extras now? Imagine that....
Originally Posted by shrapnel
I probably hit more elk with a pickup than you have with a rifle.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
I have yet to see anyone claim Leupold has never had to fix an optic. I know I have sent a few back. 2 MK 6s, a VX-6, and 3 VX-111s.
One-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified from an unprecedented statewide recount of presidential election results because of problems with ballots.
Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.
Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.
“It’s not good,” conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit.
But that would mean democrats cheated! We have been told time and time again that there is none of that going on..
"He (Baxter) blamed the discrepancies on the city’s decade-old voting machines, saying 87 optical scanners broke on Election Day. Many jammed when voters fed ballots into scanners, which can result in erroneous vote counts if ballots are inserted multiple times. Poll workers are supposed to adjust counters to reflect a single vote but in many cases failed to do so, causing the discrepancies, Baxter said."
Applying a little logic and math here, and considering we're talking about Detroit, IF there were errors causing the machines to record more than one vote per voter, AND poll workers did not make a correction, THEN the odds are better than average that the excess votes are in Hillary's favor, not Trump's.
One-third of precincts in Wayne County could be disqualified from an unprecedented statewide recount of presidential election results because of problems with ballots.
Michigan’s largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials couldn’t reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late last month.
Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
According to state law, precincts whose poll books don’t match with ballots can’t be recounted. If that happens, original election results stand.
“It’s not good,” conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit.
So we went to the moon almost fifty years ago but some can't reconcile ballots and voting machines. It's not only not "rocket science" it's not even "plumber science".
I would ask the same question as Chris Wallace, HOW MANY VOTES DID JILL STEIN GET? If there is no possible way a recount would help her chances - and there certainly isn't - she should not even be allowed to ask for a recount. If Hillary wants one, she should ask for it herself. Or better yet, shut up and fade away.
I would ask the same question as Chris Wallace, HOW MANY VOTES DID JILL STEIN GET? If there is no possible way a recount would help her chances - and there certainly isn't - she should not even be allowed to ask for a recount. If Hillary wants one, she should ask for it herself. Or better yet, shut up and fade away.
Mike
Don't do it for someone's chances. Do it to make the election honest.
Leo of the Land of Dyr
NRA FOR LIFE
I MISS SARAH
“In Trump We Trust.” Right????
SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."
Rest assured, whatever the angle is, it'll be an attempt to change future election results in favor of Democrats, not to make elections more honest or fair.
"Hey jackass, get your government off my freedom." MOLON LABE
Rest assured, whatever the angle is, it'll be an attempt to change future election results in favor of Democrats, not to make elections more honest or fair.
This
Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.
"He (Baxter) blamed the discrepancies on the city’s decade-old voting machines, saying 87 optical scanners broke on Election Day. Many jammed when voters fed ballots into scanners, which can result in erroneous vote counts if ballots are inserted multiple times. Poll workers are supposed to adjust counters to reflect a single vote but in many cases failed to do so, causing the discrepancies, Baxter said."
The voting machines might be a decade old, but how many times have they been used? A max of 3 regular elections. A max of 3 mid-term elections. Primaries for both. 12 times? What kind of junk did they buy anyway? But, maybe the dead voters wear them out faster.
“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” ― George Orwell
It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
Rest assured, whatever the angle is, it'll be an attempt to change future election results in favor of Democrats, not to make elections more honest or fair.
This
Post of the day!
Speak softly and use a big bore... Where's El Cid when we need him...
Rest assured, whatever the angle is, it'll be an attempt to change future election results in favor of Democrats, not to make elections more honest or fair.
If the dems wanted honest and fair, they wouldn't have spent the past several years fighting voter ID laws.
Rest assured, whatever the angle is, it'll be an attempt to change future election results in favor of Democrats, not to make elections more honest or fair.
If the dems wanted honest and fair, they wouldn't have spent the past several years fighting voter ID laws.
Another winner!
Heaven has a wall, a gate and strict immigration policy.
