|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,774
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,774 |
I don't know if people have looked at the new Vortex Razor Spotters but they are really, really good. They have a focus ring like the Swaro ATS/STS HD Spotting scopes and have super resolution. A big step up from extremely good spotting scopes. Vortex has always had a super spotting scope for the money.
The big thing is that they are assembled in the United States. I hope Vortex continues to move in this direction. This is for the HD65 and HD80 Spotters.
I
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239 |
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,107
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,107 |
its too bad they didn't put in more eye relief in the new vortex spotters. I really like the form factor of the new ones.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,627
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,627 |
its too bad they didn't put in more eye relief in the new vortex spotters. I really like the form factor of the new ones. Yup, I got one of the 27-60x85 new versions for this fall's moose hunt and really liked it... once I got used to the tight eye relief. It was not automatic and there was/is some concern they will not be as well-received because of it.
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 802
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 802 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,056
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,056 |
I've got one of the first gen Razor 16-48x65mm. I noticed the new version gained some weight. 48 oz to 56 oz.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 141
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 141 |
I've got one of the first gen Razor 16-48x65mm. I noticed the new version gained some weight. 48 oz to 56 oz. Me too. Compare that to a 39 oz Swarovski. If you are packing it around all day, that's over a pound difference...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
Not great stuff I'm hearing here about them...I was looking at one but may go back to plan A and get a Leupold HD
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,826
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,826 |
Buy last years Razor for $999 and under
Maker of the Frankenstud Sling Keeper
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
Buy last years Razor for $999 and under I had one before and really disliked the focus knob placement on it
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 141
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 141 |
I've got one of the first gen Razor 16-48x65mm. I noticed the new version gained some weight. 48 oz to 56 oz. Me too. Compare that to a 39 oz Swarovski. If you are packing it around all day, that's over a pound difference... I need to edit this, after more research the Swaro is about 47 oz (39 w/o eye piece) which makes an 9 oz difference, not a pound. Still considerable
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,126
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,126 |
https://montana-wild.com/vortex22-48x65-review/I think these guys are sponsored by Vortex and they feel that there was no improvement in the glass. If they had made some big improvement in the glass it would be a great spotter for the price. IMO you are far better off going with the Meopta Meopro HD80 spotter. I had one and it was excellent. Way better than my old Razor 85m spotter.
"Never miss the opportunity to shut the f$%K up." Colonel Hopewell.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,627
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 50,627 |
https://montana-wild.com/vortex22-48x65-review/I think these guys are sponsored by Vortex and they feel that there was no improvement in the glass. If they had made some big improvement in the glass it would be a great spotter for the price. IMO you are far better off going with the Meopta Meopro HD80 spotter. I had one and it was excellent. Way better than my old Razor 85m spotter. Vortex was not trying to improve the glass in the new Razors... they stand pretty well on their own. They were looking to make ergo changes... and did. I would have a very hard time accepting the Meopta being much if any better.
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,239 |
We had both a Razor Hd (old style), which I like, and my Meopta S2 out mule deer hunting today. The Meopta was noticeably better, and the only thing better that I've seen is the Swaro modular stuff @ $4000+. I would pick the Razor if my budget was $1000 though, even if it is made in China.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 315
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 315 |
https://montana-wild.com/vortex22-48x65-review/I think these guys are sponsored by Vortex and they feel that there was no improvement in the glass. If they had made some big improvement in the glass it would be a great spotter for the price. IMO you are far better off going with the Meopta Meopro HD80 spotter. I had one and it was excellent. Way better than my old Razor 85m spotter. Vortex was not trying to improve the glass in the new Razors... they stand pretty well on their own. They were looking to make ergo changes... and did. I would have a very hard time accepting the Meopta being much if any better. They're not even in the same league, the s2/euro blows the doors off the razor. One of my elk clients had a razor that he was he'll bent on packing around. I got to use it side by side with my stx85 and an ATS 80. There wasn't one category where it was close. Using the ATS 80 hd and s2 side by side, they're too close to call.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,093
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13,093 |
I haven't shopped them lately but to my eyes, I preferred the Kowa Prominar (spelling?) with 88mm Objective Lenses to anything else I looked through. The $4000 Leica was right there too. For the money, the Vortex was impressive. A lot of people didn't like the ergos but you get used that stuff pretty quick.
I don't spend hours looking through spotting scopes like the Alaska guys do, I prefer bigger binoculars myself.
NRA Benefactor Member
Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,826
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 10,826 |
I made the switch in the past season from the Leupold GR 12-40x60 to the 65mm Razor and the difference is incredible
Maker of the Frankenstud Sling Keeper
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,056
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 19,056 |
I picked up the long eye-relief 18X fixed eyepiece for my 65mm Razor. I love it.
Huge eye relief (31mm?) finally gives me a spotter that I don't need to constantly be taking glasses off and on to get a full FOV.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,126
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,126 |
I'll just say it, the 85 mm Razor is garbage. It was almost worthless above 48 power. The Meopta blows it out of the water.
"Never miss the opportunity to shut the f$%K up." Colonel Hopewell.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483 |
I'll just say it, the 85 mm Razor is garbage. It was almost worthless above 48 power. The Meopta blows it out of the water. Maybe you were looking through a bad one or something. Mine is excellent.
|
|
|
|
60 members (35, 14idaho, 3dtestify, 10gaugemag, 406_SBC, 12 invisible),
1,845
guests, and
796
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,387
Posts18,469,727
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|