|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925 |
I have a Remington Classic Model 700 in 35 Whelen. I've got a load that pushes a 225-grain bullet nearly 2,700 fps but I'm looking for one that will push a 200-grain Hornady RN to about 35 Remington speeds for small deer within 100 yards. Available powders include Reloader 17, Reloader 19, IMR 4198, H4895, IMR 4320, IMR 4064, and Ramshot TAC.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Okie John
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3 |
Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872 Likes: 5
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872 Likes: 5 |
If you have a Lyman handbook you can look at the 4198 loads for 200 grain class cast bullets.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,186 Likes: 4
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,186 Likes: 4 |
I use 4198 to push 200's at 2100. GD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,689
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,689 |
Yep!!! This is the "ONLY" powder on the list I would use to do a reduced load! Reducing loads to much with the wrong powders is extremely dangerous and can cause an "unstable" problem essentially building a bomb Trystan
Good bullets properly placed always work, but not everyone knows what good bullets are, or can reliably place them in the field
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1 |
Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity
This is a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,247
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,247 |
I'd be comfortable with the reduced-load option on H4895 or working off the cast load data with a 4198 powder. I've done both with 308-sized cases. If you aren't shooting past 175yds or so very often, a 200gr/2100fps load is plenty potent on a whitetail. Zero it about 1.5" high at 100yds and get after it, same as a .35Rem levergun.
The pig in my avatar fell to a reduced load in a .35 Whelen (225gr with RL10x book load). I wouldn't mind trying to drop it down another notch on the power factor. Should be more fun to shoot and plenty deadly.
Last edited by JPro; 03/23/22.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932 |
H4895 is your huckleberry. I have also used Accurate 5744 and Trail Boss.
Have used it many times for reduced loads in 22-250, 270 WCF, and 338-06. Probably some I have forgot.
I know you want to duplicate 35 R ballistics, but do not overlook just using starting powder charges. Velocity may be a little higher than you want, but starting loads can be very pleasant to shoot and accurate too..
Arcus Venator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872 Likes: 5
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872 Likes: 5 |
Yep!!! This is the "ONLY" powder on the list I would use to do a reduced load! Reducing loads to much with the wrong powders is extremely dangerous and can cause an "unstable" problem essentially building a bomb Trystan FYI, 4198 is well known as a powder suitable for reduced loads.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3 |
Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity
This is a bad idea. Why?
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,701 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,701 Likes: 6 |
Just knock down book loads by 10%. Why do this in the first place?
The way life should be.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3 |
Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity
This is a bad idea. Why? I loaded H4350 from 57 grains to 60 in one grain increments. 2444 FPS with 57 grains, 58 2452 FPS, 59 grains 2533 FPS and 60 grains 2531 FPS All from 28" barrel
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1 |
Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity
This is a bad idea. Why? H4350 is already too slow a powder for the .35 Whelen, IMO. The slowest powder Hodgdon recommends is Varget and the starting load is still getting 2508fps. No where near the OP's quest for a .35 Rem. Unless I'm all washed up, for reduced loads, you generally want faster burn rates. Am I wrong?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925 |
Just knock down book loads by 10%. Why do this in the first place? Several reasons. First, because I'll be hunting very small deer at relatively short range and I don't need the fire-breathing loads that I've already developed for elk and bear. Second, because I really enjoy how this this particular rifle has come together and I want to shoot it more but with less recoil. This matters because the shots on this hunt are all offhand and very quick, so I need to shoot a lot to get ready. Yes, I'll dry-fire but I want a lighter load for live-fire training. Third, because components are scarce and I want to conserve the more broadly-applicable powders that I have on hand and that work best for other cartridges that I like. Finally, because I just want to. Okie John
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959 Likes: 3 |
Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity
This is a bad idea. Why? H4350 is already too slow a powder for the .35 Whelen, IMO. The slowest powder Hodgdon recommends is Varget and the starting load is still getting 2508fps. No where near the OP's quest for a .35 Rem. Unless I'm all washed up, for reduced loads, you generally want faster burn rates. Am I wrong? H4350 is too slow fir top velocity A slow powder that fills the case will also slow velocity.. look at my post above with H4350 and 200 grain Hornaday
Last edited by jwp475; 03/23/22.
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1 |
Your lowest load is 400fps over what a .35 Rem would be doing with a 200. I don't think he'll loose that going from you're 28" barrel to the classics 22". Besides, H4350 wasn't one of the powders he said was on hand. I still think a dose of fast rate powder is better for reduced loads, but then again, I'm not a gunwriter.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925 |
I'm also thinking about running a pistol bullet over a shotgun powder like Unique or 2400. Initial tests got a 150-grain bullet going 1,450-ish with good groups, but POI was over a foot low at 100.
Okie John
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676 |
I like the idea of a nice whelen downloaded to 35 remington speeds for hunting in the timber for deer. Gives some more flexibility to take a nice whelen hunting more and I like the bigger hole without ruining a lot of meat.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,172 Likes: 14
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,172 Likes: 14 |
I am..........disturbed.
Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain
|
|
|
|
247 members (1minute, 1beaver_shooter, 1_deuce, 16gage, 17CalFan, 10gaugemag, 37 invisible),
1,886
guests, and
1,046
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,860
Posts18,497,174
Members73,979
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|