24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
O
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
I have a Remington Classic Model 700 in 35 Whelen. I've got a load that pushes a 225-grain bullet nearly 2,700 fps but I'm looking for one that will push a 200-grain Hornady RN to about 35 Remington speeds for small deer within 100 yards. Available powders include Reloader 17, Reloader 19, IMR 4198, H4895, IMR 4320, IMR 4064, and Ramshot TAC.

Thoughts?

Thanks,


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
GB1

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3

Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676
I would start with 4895 since you can use reduced loads with safety.


https://www.handloadermagazine.com/reduced-rifle-loads

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872
Likes: 5
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872
Likes: 5
If you have a Lyman handbook you can look at the 4198 loads for 200 grain class cast bullets.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,186
Likes: 4
G
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,186
Likes: 4
I use 4198 to push 200's at 2100. GD

IC B2

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,689
T
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
T
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,689
Originally Posted by patbrennan
I would start with 4895 since you can use reduced loads with safety.


https://www.handloadermagazine.com/reduced-rifle-loads


Yep!!! This is the "ONLY" powder on the list I would use to do a reduced load! Reducing loads to much with the wrong powders is extremely dangerous and can cause an "unstable" problem essentially building a bomb



Trystan


Good bullets properly placed always work, but not everyone knows what good bullets are, or can reliably place them in the field
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jwp475

Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity


This is a bad idea.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,247
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,247
I'd be comfortable with the reduced-load option on H4895 or working off the cast load data with a 4198 powder. I've done both with 308-sized cases. If you aren't shooting past 175yds or so very often, a 200gr/2100fps load is plenty potent on a whitetail. Zero it about 1.5" high at 100yds and get after it, same as a .35Rem levergun.

The pig in my avatar fell to a reduced load in a .35 Whelen (225gr with RL10x book load). I wouldn't mind trying to drop it down another notch on the power factor. Should be more fun to shoot and plenty deadly.

Last edited by JPro; 03/23/22.

Now with even more aplomb
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932
H4895 is your huckleberry. I have also used Accurate 5744 and Trail Boss.

Have used it many times for reduced loads in 22-250, 270 WCF, and 338-06. Probably some I have forgot.

I know you want to duplicate 35 R ballistics, but do not overlook just using starting powder charges. Velocity may be a little higher than you want, but starting loads can be very pleasant to shoot and accurate too..


Arcus Venator
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872
Likes: 5
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,872
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Trystan
Originally Posted by patbrennan
I would start with 4895 since you can use reduced loads with safety.

https://www.handloadermagazine.com/reduced-rifle-loads


Yep!!! This is the "ONLY" powder on the list I would use to do a reduced load! Reducing loads to much with the wrong powders is extremely dangerous and can cause an "unstable" problem essentially building a bomb

Trystan


FYI, 4198 is well known as a powder suitable for reduced loads.

IC B3

Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Teeder
Originally Posted by jwp475

Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity


This is a bad idea.


Why?



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,701
Likes: 6
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,701
Likes: 6
Just knock down book loads by 10%. Why do this in the first place?


The way life should be.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Teeder
Originally Posted by jwp475

Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity


This is a bad idea.


Why?


I loaded H4350 from 57 grains to 60 in one grain increments. 2444 FPS with 57 grains, 58 2452 FPS, 59 grains 2533 FPS and 60 grains 2531 FPS
All from 28" barrel



I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Teeder
Originally Posted by jwp475

Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity


This is a bad idea.


Why?


H4350 is already too slow a powder for the .35 Whelen, IMO.
The slowest powder Hodgdon recommends is Varget and the starting load is still getting 2508fps. No where near the OP's quest for a .35 Rem.
Unless I'm all washed up, for reduced loads, you generally want faster burn rates. Am I wrong?

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
O
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
Originally Posted by bluefish
Just knock down book loads by 10%. Why do this in the first place?

Several reasons.

First, because I'll be hunting very small deer at relatively short range and I don't need the fire-breathing loads that I've already developed for elk and bear.

Second, because I really enjoy how this this particular rifle has come together and I want to shoot it more but with less recoil. This matters because the shots on this hunt are all offhand and very quick, so I need to shoot a lot to get ready. Yes, I'll dry-fire but I want a lighter load for live-fire training.

Third, because components are scarce and I want to conserve the more broadly-applicable powders that I have on hand and that work best for other cartridges that I like.

Finally, because I just want to.


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3
J
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Sleepy
Campfire 'Bwana
J
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30,959
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Teeder
Originally Posted by jwp475
Originally Posted by Teeder
Originally Posted by jwp475

Load a slow burning powder like H4350 I wouldn't think that it would make high velocity


This is a bad idea.


Why?


H4350 is already too slow a powder for the .35 Whelen, IMO.
The slowest powder Hodgdon recommends is Varget and the starting load is still getting 2508fps. No where near the OP's quest for a .35 Rem.
Unless I'm all washed up, for reduced loads, you generally want faster burn rates. Am I wrong?


H4350 is too slow fir top velocity

A slow powder that fills the case will also slow velocity.. look at my post above with H4350 and 200 grain Hornaday



Last edited by jwp475; 03/23/22.


I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Your lowest load is 400fps over what a .35 Rem would be doing with a 200. I don't think he'll loose that going from you're 28" barrel to the classics 22".
Besides, H4350 wasn't one of the powders he said was on hand.
I still think a dose of fast rate powder is better for reduced loads, but then again, I'm not a gunwriter. grin

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
O
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,925
I'm also thinking about running a pistol bullet over a shotgun powder like Unique or 2400. Initial tests got a 150-grain bullet going 1,450-ish with good groups, but POI was over a foot low at 100.


Okie John


Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676
P
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,676
I like the idea of a nice whelen downloaded to 35 remington speeds for hunting in the timber for deer. Gives some more flexibility to take a nice whelen hunting more and I like the bigger hole without ruining a lot of meat.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,172
Likes: 14
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,172
Likes: 14


I am..........disturbed.

Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

247 members (1minute, 1beaver_shooter, 1_deuce, 16gage, 17CalFan, 10gaugemag, 37 invisible), 1,886 guests, and 1,046 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,860
Posts18,497,174
Members73,979
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.162s Queries: 55 (0.010s) Memory: 0.9066 MB (Peak: 1.0219 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-08 05:21:24 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS