Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Drones, modern warfare and the next step

Somebody stroke Burns so he can feel better about himself FCS

One of my skillsets is exposing morons for the losers they are. No video needed.

Thanks for the assist.

Thanks.

It's pretty kewl to know one is impervious to drone attacks.



You girls got to get in a whole lot of range time to catch up.

Cover yourself with cold mud and set booby traps?

You're confusing body fat with body armor.

I watched a documentary film about just such a situation.

Getting to the "choppar" was also important.

T-72s don't have enough armour to be safe from drones.

I have the requsite shooting skillz, shown in video, to slay all the drones before needing armour.


Yes. A very good chance if you stick with me.

From what I've seen in your handjob videos, there's only two things you can't hit.

Jack, and sh*t.

Many pharmacies ask you to prove your age because cough syrup contains "dextromethorphan." If you drink enough of it, the effects can be like alcohol and it can get you intoxicated.

Mr. Burns I think you are confused. Armour is the company that makes the potted meat you had for dinner.

Were the enemy to go beyond the standard commercial control frequencies, and standard commercial AV frequencies, (without violating NDA/US security clearance regulations) are there solutions to the issue of drone detection and disablement?

It's been years since I played with a quadcopter, and thus can't recall frequencies used (even if spread spectrum), but there weren't that many, and it didn't seem like any evil actors would be all that constrained when it came to control and/or visual feedback to the operator. GPS jamming and/or spoofing didn't seem like an insurmountable problem either. I"m thinking the latter is what the Dronebuster is using, if you can point it at a simple UAV and then point the UAV where you want it to go crash.

P.S. 200' seems about right. For a quadcopter... For a dedicated quiet power glider, make that a lot closer. Think owl quiet....

LOL

Burns"ll Drank.

There is a constant fight between electronic warfare and drone attack. It ebbs and flows much like radars and missles.

The latest drones have AI algos that the operater can select a target from a far range and the drone will attack that target through optical, thermal, lidar on board sensors and guidance.

You better have an active/kenetic means of killing the drone on the way in if you want to survive.

The commercial/personal drones use 2.4 GHz and 5.8 Ghz for command and control. I'm not an RF guy but I'd think that it would be difficult to switch both the drone and the controller to different frequencies. But some inventive bad guy will probably figure it out once it gets to be a problem.

Cat and mouse.

They are spread spectrum. Think they are using QAM.

Can't say too much about how we did what regarding the GPS and CC, but getting the drone to go in the general direction you wanted it to was not hard once you had all your ducks in a row.

Jamming it to get it to land or hover is even easier.

Red, hot, jam. Anyone remember that moniker?

I just watched a video from Ukraine today. It appears both sides are using some kind of jammer but they have very limited range. It appears AI has also been programmed into some of the drones. Not quite like launch and forget and let the drone do it's thing, but close.

kwg

I think that ground wars should have stopped ages ago. You can do simple math on the resources and equipment each side has and know the winner before it starts. We could blow anyone off the face of the earth in a day. But we don't do that. We string it out for years and others countries do the same.

Lol, you shoot Clays like a faag.

If and when it comes down to a battle please stay home as no one wants you on the battlefield with them.

What about a miniaturized version of the Phalanx CIWS that would shoot 5.56x45 instead of 20mm ammo?