Yes, I expected the 8.14 should have been 9.14. If a Winchester Model 70 was rebarreled to .375 H & H perhaps from .300 WM or .338 WM, would the B & C Medalist stock which has the aluminum bedding block and weighs 30.5 oz, be strong enough to withstand the recoil of .375 H & H and 350gn Woodleighs with only a single recoil lug? Or is the stock likely to eventually crack? Could get the weight down to an ideal 9lbs with scope with 23" barrel if so.
I have no doubt that the B&C medalist stock can handle the job with only the primary recoil lug of the action.
I have a done a .458 WinMag in the long action from a .416 RemMag M70 Classic,
and no secondary recoil lug on the barrel of this "custom" .458 WinMag.
Used a B&C Medalist stock glass bedded,
Burris Xtac 2-piece cross-slot scope bases,
McGowen No.4 sporter contour cut to 23" length,
banded front sight that came off a CZ 550 Magnum.
Unloaded weight of above = 7 lbs 10 oz = 7.625 lbs.
Add that mythical 1.000-pound scope and rings and you get 8 lbs 10 oz.
I once did a .375 H&H on a Pre-'64 M70 H&H action in a Brown Pounder stock with No.3 sporter 24" long,
NECG banded front sight and steel Weaver-style scope bases.
6.75 lbs, perfectly balanced by light stock and light barrel.
That rifle was a great success in Alaska and Africa.
I always used the Leupold VXIII 2.5-8x36mm scope on it.
Some will claim to have done lighter .375 H&H or .375 Wby rifles than that.
Ouch.