24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
D
djs Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
D
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,810
The Rem SAUM is probably a better ballistic choice, but the 300 WSM is probably easier to find in stores selling ammo. The jury is still out on the 300 Ruger Compact Mag, but it should succeed with time.

HR IC

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,506
H
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
H
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,506
i'd suggest the saum.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,759
V
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
V
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,759
Ir your a reloader I'd go SAUM, if not stick with the much more popular WSM.........................547.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,040
A
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,040
I think that a Remington Model 7 in 30 SAUM is an interesting rifle. I think that's what I would go with if, I wanted to try the 30 caliber short action magnums.

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185
C
CLB Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,185
SAUM and just buy enough brass. Just in case.....

IC B2

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 349
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 349
I had a 300 WSM that shot bug holes with the first handload I tried in it. However, it didn't like any of the factory ammo that I tried. I vote for the 300 wsm

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,548
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,548
.300 WSM does not look like it will die anytime soon. Can't say the same about the SAUM. Even if you handload, you still want to have readily available brass and you may want to sell that rifle someday. It would be a hard sell even with a stockpile of brass. My 2 cents.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,757
P
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
P
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,757
300wsm over here!

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 497
M
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 497
I haven't shot any of them but I read an article comparing the SAUM to the WSM a while back. The SAUM has better ballistics while the WSM has a higher case capicity. This is possible because they used a special bullet that didn't use up as much of the case capacity. When they compared the two with other premium bullets the WSM outperformed. Don't know if this is obvious, thought I'd thow it out there.

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,852
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,852
I've had both and currently have a SAUM. They are very similar but I did get a bit more velocity from the WSM - which makes sense since it has a bit more case capacity. I like both and can see a good multi-purpose rifle in either caliber. Useful velocities are 2950/3000 with 180's, 3050/3100 with 165's. To me, that velocity makes it a bit more useful than the good ole 06 - but only in my head. I'm sure there ain't too many critters running around that will notice the extra 150 ft/sec between the WSM/SAUM and the 30-06.

In the end, I really like the short handiness of the SAUM package. For me, the difference in rifle length seems to feel better. I've hunted the WSM/SAUM on a couple of elk hunts and the short handiness and lightweight were welcome. YMMV.


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
IC B3

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

106 members (338reddog, 7mm_Loco, 79S, 2ndwind, 257_X_50, 35WhelenNut, 18 invisible), 1,606 guests, and 879 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,368
Posts18,488,290
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.284s Queries: 35 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8470 MB (Peak: 0.9148 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 07:02:24 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS