|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,062
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,062 |
I haven't been able to find any IMR4350 lately but did come across a large supply of Accurate 4350. What's everyone's opinion on this powder? I've never used any Accurate powders.
I know I'm gonna have to totally start fresh with load work, but I'm sure it should be pretty close and I expect to get similar results.
"243/85TSX It's as if the HAMMER OF THOR were wielded by CHUCK NORRIS himself, and a roundhouse kick thrown in for good measure."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,258
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,258 |
Works fine for me. I initially picked up an 8 lb keg on sale for $69. I intended to use for practice loads, but does very well in 243, 270 and 30-06. Now I'm on my second keg. I also like Accurate 4064 which has a short cut and meters much better. Generally AA 4350 burns a little slower that H4350. AA 4064 burns a little slower than IMR 4064.
Last edited by Prwlr; 04/03/10.
Ed
A person who asks a question is a fool for 5 minutes the person who never asks is a fool forever.
The worst slaves are those that put the chains on themselves.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,116 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,116 Likes: 2 |
It works fine. I can usually squeeze a few FPS more out of H4350, but the differences are small. The jars I have on hand seem to be a trifle faster than H4350, but there is enough variation from batch to batch that it is probably just normal random variation.
Be not weary in well doing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,852
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,852 |
My M700 300 SAUM absolutely loves the stuff. I bought it as a cheap practice powder for bulk reloading. Ended up several rifles really like it.
Another curiousity with AA 4350. Take a look at the Hodgdon Extreme powder examples they published a few years back. Note how AA 4350 worked from 0 to 70. Pressure and velocity actually increase slightly at 0 compared to 70. I'm not sure how that would work exactly but it is in their guide that way.
To me, AA 4350 is slightly slower than H/IMR variety in the catridges I've used it in. The manuals in some cases show a grain ro 2 more AA4350 than IMR/H.
Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,191
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 7,191 |
I've burned enough of it that I feel safe saying, its pretty much a cheaper version of IMR4350. I have no preferance between the two.
But H4350 will be the one I keep around in 8 pounders. Cleaner burn, and mo' faster. The only two calibers I really burn it in are the 30-06 and 260 with lightweights.
I'm Irish...
Of course I know how to patch drywall
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,141
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,141 |
Dan,
I too use H4350 in the .260, both with 120 grain and 100 grain bullets. I've worried a couple of time that it might be a little too slow for the lighter bullets. Most of what I've read says to use a faster powder for the lighter bullet weights in the .260, and I've wondered if this might be a minor safety concern. But H4350 groups better than Varget with those 100 grainers. What has been your experience with H4350 and the light weight bullets in the .260?
|
|
|
|
515 members (219DW, 1234, 2500HD, 007FJ, 12344mag, 1minute, 56 invisible),
2,424
guests, and
1,323
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,796
Posts18,496,236
Members73,977
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|