|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,062 Likes: 65
Campfire Sage
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,062 Likes: 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261 |
It's city ordinance. This is the capital remember.
If a deer attacks someone. The city police, in conjunction with FWP, have killed over 700 deer so the deer problem is not as bad as it was. I've only seen about a half dozen deer in my neck of the woods since the thinning.
Only in Helena and I'm told in East Helena. Fortunately, I've never had to put it to the test.
Don't vote knothead, it only encourages them. Anonymous
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups." Anonymous
"Self-reliance, free thinking, and wealth is anathema to both the power of the State and the Church." Derby Dude
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
Travis;
It must be very hard for him to keep on "his game" when the pain of being told that he couldn't be a cop (perhaps because he deep down wants to be the type of cop he's always imagining any/all others to be?) is pervasive throughout all of his LEO readings/posts.
He'll run out on that limb in an instant, and blather on and on about "police brutality/double standards", and when facts show him to be a complete [bleep] fool, he can't/won't admit the mistake. Doing so would shame him further through validation of law enforcement, and redeem a cop; that duo is just untenable to Chris at this point.
And, to think he has direct influence on children throughout the year.... Hopefully, they can see/smell BS as well as most here. You've obviously had this rodeo before.  I honestly try and stay out of these type of threads. I guess I was just bored last night. Eye opening though. Travis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
It's city ordinance. This is the capital remember.
If a deer attacks someone. The city police, in conjunction with FWP, have killed over 700 deer so the deer problem is not as bad as it was. I've only seen about a half dozen deer in my neck of the woods since the thinning.
Only in Helena and I'm told in East Helena. Fortunately, I've never had to put it to the test. Oh. Travis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 26,524
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 26,524 |
It must be very hard for him to keep on "his game" when the pain of being told that he couldn't be a cop (perhaps because he deep down wants to be the type of cop he's always imagining any/all others to be?) is pervasive throughout all of his LEO readings/posts.
Freudian, in a big way....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
Travis;
It must be very hard for him to keep on "his game" when the pain of being told that he couldn't be a cop (perhaps because he deep down wants to be the type of cop he's always imagining any/all others to be?) is pervasive throughout all of his LEO readings/posts.
He'll run out on that limb in an instant, and blather on and on about "police brutality/double standards", and when facts show him to be a complete [bleep] fool, he can't/won't admit the mistake. Doing so would shame him further through validation of law enforcement, and redeem a cop; that duo is just untenable to Chris at this point.
And, to think he has direct influence on children throughout the year.... Hopefully, they can see/smell BS as well as most here. You've obviously had this rodeo before. I honestly try and stay out of these type of threads. I guess I was just bored last night. Eye opening though. Travis He gets on a high horse when other folks get cornered and hoisted by their own petard, regaling them back into the argument... But, when it's him, and he's caught, cornered and made, he'll dodge (poorly), try to change the subject to something completely off-original-topic, or lastly, he'll just put you on ignore if you keep nailing him repeatedly. And, yeah, bt/dt.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
It must be very hard for him to keep on "his game" when the pain of being told that he couldn't be a cop (perhaps because he deep down wants to be the type of cop he's always imagining any/all others to be?) is pervasive throughout all of his LEO readings/posts.
Freudian, in a big way.... Ya think?  And, folks wonder why Chris put me on "ignore"....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,062 Likes: 65
Campfire Sage
|
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,062 Likes: 65 |
Not every situation where a gun goes off and a bullet hits a dog is the same. Both shooters were clearly in the wrong, but the cop was more so in that his shooting was admittedly intentional. One is a matter of recklessness while the other is a matter of malice. The law deals with the two differently.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
Not every situation where a gun goes off and a bullet hits a dog is the same. Both shooters were clearly in the wrong, but the cop was more so in that his shooting was admittedly intentional. One is a matter of recklessness while the other is a matter of malice. The law deals with the two differently. And, you have no proof of either, nor anything else. You are, again, guessing and with a heavy bias. Some days, you really do make this schit WAY too easy.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
Not every situation where a gun goes off and a bullet hits a dog is the same. Both shooters were clearly in the wrong, but the cop was more so in that his shooting was admittedly intentional. One is a matter of recklessness while the other is a matter of malice. The law deals with the two differently. I thank you for informing me that all shootings are not the same. But you have stated you have a problem with "double standards". Had the shooter in Washington been a cop and not been arrested you quite obviously would have cried foul there as well. Travis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
I thank you for informing me that all shootings are not the same.
But you have stated you have a problem with "double standards". Had the shooter in Washington been a cop and not been arrested you quite obviously would have cried foul there as well.
Travis
As stated, some days this schit is just TOO easy....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261 |
All police should be held to a higher standard than the civilian because police have special privileges that the civilian does not.
Don't vote knothead, it only encourages them. Anonymous
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups." Anonymous
"Self-reliance, free thinking, and wealth is anathema to both the power of the State and the Church." Derby Dude
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
All police should be held to a higher standard than the civilian because police have special privileges that the civilian does not. Wait, I thought I remembered you being one of the ones that claimed that any special classes of people within the nation was an abomination, or something like that. So, which is it? Do we have special classes, or don't we?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
All police should be held to a higher standard than the civilian because police have special privileges that the civilian does not. That's a [bleep]' knee slapper right there. Travis
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261
Campfire 'Bwana
|
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 34,261 |
All police should be held to a higher standard than the civilian because police have special privileges that the civilian does not. Wait, I thought I remembered you being one of the ones that claimed that any special classes of people within the nation was an abomination, or something like that. So, which is it? Do we have special classes, or don't we? I think you have me mixed up with someone else. But to answer your question police by the nature of their job are special people. Whether than puts them in a class by themselves or not I don't know. Police enforce the law. If ignorance of the law is no excuse for the civilian it certainly is no excuse for the police. When I worked for the Department of Revenue we were held to a higher standard on our taxes because we were revenuers even those of us who did not in anyway enforce revenue laws. As a professional tax preparer, I'm held to a higher standard then a civilian would be after all I'm suppose to know the law. That's the way it should be. Whether or not that puts us in classes or not I don't know.
Don't vote knothead, it only encourages them. Anonymous
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups." Anonymous
"Self-reliance, free thinking, and wealth is anathema to both the power of the State and the Church." Derby Dude
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
Damn, another one.... What a double standard there is....... in Chris' mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
All police should be held to a higher standard than the civilian because police have special privileges that the civilian does not. Wait, I thought I remembered you being one of the ones that claimed that any special classes of people within the nation was an abomination, or something like that. So, which is it? Do we have special classes, or don't we? I think you have me mixed up with someone else. But to answer your question police by the nature of their job are special people. Whether than puts them in a class by themselves or not I don't know. Police enforce the law. If ignorance of the law is no excuse for the civilian it certainly is no excuse for the police. When I worked for the Department of Revenue we were held to a higher standard on our taxes because we were revenuers even those of us who did not in anyway enforce revenue laws. As a professional tax preparer, I'm held to a higher standard then a civilian would be after all I'm suppose to know the law. That's the way it should be. Whether or not that puts us in classes or not I don't know. Fair enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,062 Likes: 65
Campfire Sage
|
|
OP
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 132,062 Likes: 65 |
Yeah, right. You guys are not getting (or pretending not to get) the very fundamental difference between a dog park (an enclosure where everyone is presumed to understand that dogs are running loose and roughhousing) and walking your dog on a leash in an area where loose dogs are a violation of the law. When you take your dog into a dog park enclosure you are presumed to understand there's a risk of a fight, and to be willing to cooperate with others in breaking up such fights without resorting to deadly force. Not the case with walking your dog elsewhere. No one is presumed to have agreed to any such possibility when on a walk with their dog. Night and day. Not even close. Man, are you guys reaching.
|
|
|
|
|
241 members (264mag, 2500HD, 257 mag, 160user, 1shotnokilz, 30incher, 20 invisible),
16,977
guests, and
1,048
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,880
Posts18,538,299
Members74,050
| |
Most Online20,796
Yesterday at 04:44 PM
|
|
|
|
