|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,133
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,133 |
A friend seems to be enamored of the .20 Practical, which is, I believe, a .223 simply necked down to .20 caliber with no other changes. He feels that it will allow him to see the hits on prairie dogs better than the .204 and certainly better than his .22-250. I don't think there is much difference between the .204 and the .20 Practical, other than one is a factory load. Am I missing something? Does the .204 allow you to see prairie dogs hits? I would think you can load either to a lower level is that is your goal....
�That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.� George Orwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,173 |
Haven't ever tried the .20 Practical, but can see my hits just fine with the .204 Ruger. Great little cartridge - and no need to load it down...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,482 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,482 Likes: 2 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,485 Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,485 Likes: 2 |
The draw to the 20 Practical is the issue of abundant 223 brass as opposed to buying factory 204 brass. From what I can find Ballistics are for all practical purposes the same. As for seeing your bullet strike you can do that with the 223.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,787 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 15,787 Likes: 3 |
yeah and i don't think brass is any different in price either way if you're not buying the cheapo stuff
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
My experience is that a heavy-barreled .223 will come down out of recoil enough to see bullet hits at 150-200 yards or more--sort of, depending on where the bullet hits. But I couldn't see the bullet strikes consistenly with a heavy-barreled .223 a month or so ago on a PD shoot, even when using 40-grain bullets
A sporter-weight .204 allows you to do the same thing, often even better. With a heavy-barreled .204 you can look through the scope the entire time, especially with 32-grain bullets. Of course a .221 or .17 Fireball, .22 Hornet, or anything like that upsets the view through the scope even less--but they don't have the range of a .204.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,485 Likes: 2
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,485 Likes: 2 |
MD Does stock design play a role in seeing the hit or not? I have ran more than 15000 rounds through a Herters 223 regular barrel and have no problem seeing my hits or misses at 400 yards. But with a Savage comp. stock of recent vintage it is a little harder to see. Both are sporter weight barrels and I shoot mostly 55 gr. bullets. I think than most high volume shooters who reload shoot more Military brass than commercial. At least that is the case with the ones that I know. That would be the draw to me to go to the 20 Practical. For those that do not reload the cost would be much the same.
|
|
|
|
578 members (257Bob, 21, 160user, 257 roberts, 1lessdog, 1_deuce, 52 invisible),
2,579
guests, and
1,231
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,368
Posts18,527,313
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|