|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
Hey guys. Would like some data. I loaded some 50gr Barnes ttsx over IMR 8208. Am wondering if the program thinks I'm getting close to max load. No sign of overpressure so far. Here's what I got:
Bullet is 50gr TTSX (Similiar to 50gr TSX), overall length 2.204". Rifle is Remy model 7 with 18.5" barrel.
24.9gr IMR 8208, velocity 3091 and 3073. 25.1gr IMR 8208, velocity 3130 and 3128. 25.3gr IMR 8208, velocity 3130 and 3102.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540 |
The Chosin Few November to December 1950, Korea. I'm not one of the Chosin Few but no more remarkable group of Americans ever existed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540 |
Adjusting the weighting factor to correlate with your indicated speeds the 25.1gr load goes 56,663 psi. The 25.3 load runs 58,188.
The Chosin Few November to December 1950, Korea. I'm not one of the Chosin Few but no more remarkable group of Americans ever existed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
Thanks for that. I don't plan on going up any more, but I have easy bolt lift, no extractor marks, etc. But would you guys consider that the absolute upper limit? These are mono copper bullets.
Another thing I neglected to mention that the Chrono was 5yds from the barrel, so the mussel velocity should read 3150fps. I suppose that further increases the pressure, eh?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540 |
A more accurate estimate can be given if the actual case capacity in grains of water is known.
I think you still have room to work pressurewise but you'll be running even more compressed loads.
The Chosin Few November to December 1950, Korea. I'm not one of the Chosin Few but no more remarkable group of Americans ever existed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
It's Winchester brass, 30.2gr of H20 capacity. Shot some groups with 25.2gr load, very poor, around 3".
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540 |
With a capacity of 30.2 gr [bleep] gets really interesting.
How does 27gr of 8028 running 59,821 psi and pushing the 50gr TTSX to, get this, 3342 out of your 18.5" tube sound?
You're at almost 109% of capacity though so you're running pretty compressed.
The Chosin Few November to December 1950, Korea. I'm not one of the Chosin Few but no more remarkable group of Americans ever existed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
So you think i have room to play with? But how close to real world is that Quickload data?
I was aiming for 3200fps. I wasn't able to find any tsx with 8028 data, so I just did some cross referencing and came up with that # myself as being close to max safe load velocity.
The Hodgson data website shows a 45gr Sierra Sfire (i believe solid copper) bullet being driven at 3490fps out of a 24" barrel, OAL of 2.220, using a 26gr compressed load, at 52,100 PSI.
Don't know how that translates exactly to the 50gr TTSX. Does Quickload make sense with the above?
I haven't noticed any visible high pressure signs. The primers are fairly flattened, but I'm using Winchester, which are supposedly softer that others.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540 |
You have room pressurewise but not capacitywise.
The Chosin Few November to December 1950, Korea. I'm not one of the Chosin Few but no more remarkable group of Americans ever existed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
So suppose i increase the OAL to say 2.220". What'll that do to the pressure when using the same powder weight? Also, wouldn't seatIng closer to the lands increase pressure?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
Got some more info. The bullets engage the rifling at an OAL of 2.232".
Looks like I'll have to seat them deeper in the casing (Barnes recommends seating between .030 and .070 off the lands). So, if it's already a compressed load, I presume seating even deeper, say at OAL of 2.185, will not increase pressure, eh?
What velocity and pressure do 25gr 8208 and OAL 2.185 give you?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 16,540 |
Many Barnes users run them right on the lands despite Barnes' recommendation.
The numbers come up 49K and 3069.
26gr gets 55.6K and 3198. But at 105% fill.
The Chosin Few November to December 1950, Korea. I'm not one of the Chosin Few but no more remarkable group of Americans ever existed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
25.2gr of 8208 with OAL of 2.182" (.050 off lands) gives me:
3130fps, 3105fps,, and 3120fps at the mussel.
2 bullets were touching, other was 2" straight down.
Last edited by coach71; 06/07/12.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
Can QuickTime do that time in barrel calculation and predict at what time the bullets leaves the barrel? I'm thinking of that theory where guys find an accuracy node by having the bullet exit the barrel at a time when the vibrations created by ignition have traveled from the end of the barrel back towards the action.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,187
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,187 |
Chris Long's Optimal Barrel Time hypothesis? QL and a chronograph are used to help with that calculation, yes. I have used it for that purpose myself, in fact. As a suggestion (in case you're not necessarily a gadget freak, or have a limited budget), try this: http://optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/I have found that to be dramatically faster & more efficient at finding an accuracy 'node' for what I want from a rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
Yep. That's what I'm referring to. What I'd like is what that theory thinks are the accuracy nodes. Here's some info:
Remy model 7 bolt .223 with 18.5" sporter barrel. Winchester brass 30.2gr H2O capacity. IMR 8208 and 50gr Barnes TTSX. 25.2gr of 8208, OAL of 2.182" (.050" off lands) giving you average velocity of 3115fps.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,187
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,187 |
The barrel time nodes for Chris' hypothesis are on his website: http://www.the-long-family.com/OBT_paper.htmFor the estimated/predicted barrel times of your load and rifle, you'll need to buy QL, and probably a chrono.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 134 |
Got the chrono but no QL, so need someone to run the numbers for me, kindly. From Chris' paper, my OBTs are:
1) 0.628ms 2) 0.700ms 3) 0.785ms 4) 0.858ms
Unless I didn't calculate correctly, that doesn't look like a linear relationship.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,187
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,187 |
It is not linear. I don't recall Chris' proposed explanation for the non-linearity just now, nor for certain whether he has a proposal, but it may either be on his site or at another he used to frequent.
|
|
|
|
613 members (1OntarioJim, 160user, 10gaugeman, 16gage, 10ring1, 60 invisible),
2,455
guests, and
1,266
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,059
Posts18,501,193
Members73,987
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|