24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,268
Likes: 4
S
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,268
Likes: 4
I have often read that shorter barrels will have more Muzzle flash because the smokeless powder is still burning as the bullet exits the barrel. Therefore, shorter barrels require a faster burning powder for complete combustion of the powder.

I always thought that the powder was completely burned within the first few inches of the bore and barrel length had nothing to do with complete combustion.

Question, how does smokeless powder burn in a rifle barrel? All the way down the bore or within the first few inches of the bore?

Thanks


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
GB1

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 31,273
Likes: 7
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 31,273
Likes: 7
First few inches. Muzzle flash is due to an entirely different thing: flammable gasses igniting in the presence of atmospheric oxygen. Gun propellants "burn rich" and there is fuel left over after all the oxygen in the powder is consumed.


Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,817
+2..........More gas is what you get from the muzzle with shorter barrels.

Whether using faster burning powders or slower burning powders, the powder granules are all burned up within the first few inches down the bore.

Regardless of barrel length, load for your particular round the same.



28 Nosler,,,,300WSM,,,,338-378 Wby,,,,375 Ruger


Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,942
Likes: 3
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,942
Likes: 3
There are lots of guys who are convinced that shorter barrels require faster powder. It makes perfect sense, but I've read from several on various internet forums that this is not true. That the same powders that give the best speed from longer barrels will also give the best speeds from shorter barrels. From my somewhat limited loading and chronograph work this certainly seems to be the case.

My question is this. Can someone offer some documentation to back this up. I've discussed this with several others in the past and telling them "I read it on the internet" just doesn't seem to convince them. A little proof would be helpful.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,862
Likes: 4
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,862
Likes: 4
Have them look at Hodgdon's data for a few rifle cartridges that were also tested in 15" barrels for the pistol data section. There isn't any significant rearrangement of powders vs. performance.

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,320
1
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
1
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,320
Several years ago, I had a TC in .30-30. It had a 10 inch barrel.

I thought the same thing, that I needed a faster powder than what would be used in a .30-30 rifle. I contacted Sierra, and their reply was, after the results of much testing and chronographing, the same as the comments above. If it is a rifle cartridge, use a rifle powder, regardless of barrel length.

I did not see the documentation that would back this up, but I trust Sierra's testing and results.

Rocky's explanation for this is about the best I have ever read.

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,152
Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16,152
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by JMR40
There are lots of guys who are convinced that shorter barrels require faster powder. It makes perfect sense, but I've read from several on various internet forums that this is not true. That the same powders that give the best speed from longer barrels will also give the best speeds from shorter barrels. From my somewhat limited loading and chronograph work this certainly seems to be the case.

My question is this. Can someone offer some documentation to back this up. I've discussed this with several others in the past and telling them "I read it on the internet" just doesn't seem to convince them. A little proof would be helpful.

I don't know about the "best speed", but I've got custom X-P 100's in 223, 6 BR, and 6.5-284, all using the same powders in them as in their long barreled counterparts, accuracy being the more important aspect .

Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 294
D
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
D
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 294
Hi all,

Some time ago I read a book about "Interior Ballistics of Bullets" or what they do while still in the barrel and factors related to performance(or something like that, I am out and about and not sitting in my house where the book is) and the explaination of the increased muzzle speed from longer barrels is because the expanding gas from the gun powder has a longer time to push the bullet down the bore, so the speed increases. In addition, I think JB did an article on this subject as well in Handloader.


Rick

Life is not a spectator sport, get out and have fun.



Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,500
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,500
Twelve years ago when I got my 15" barreled T/C Encore handgun in 7mm-08 I heard some of that "use a faster powder" school of thinking. After a few years of experimentation, chronographing, reading HANDLOADER, and consulting folks who know a lot more than me, that gun now runs on IMR-4064 and mostly with 139 gr. Hornadys. Seems to me that faster powder for shorter barrels stuff is another one of those myths that seem to hang on in spite of tons of evidence to the contrary.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,116
Likes: 1
D
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
D
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,116
Likes: 1
Quote
Question, how does smokeless powder burn in a rifle barrel? All the way down the bore or within the first few inches of the bore?


There is a calculator available that shows the point at which the powder is all burned. There are cases you can contrive where it requires 12" or so for the powder to completely burn. But those situations are few (really heavy load of very slow powder). "All burned in the first few inches" isn't always correct, but more often so than not. Download NABM here. Scroll down.


Be not weary in well doing.
IC B3


Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

605 members (1minute, 160user, 10Glocks, 22250rem, 1936M71, 007FJ, 66 invisible), 2,592 guests, and 1,241 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,480
Posts18,490,058
Members73,972
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 1.991s Queries: 34 (0.008s) Memory: 0.8417 MB (Peak: 0.8961 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-05 00:32:44 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS