...or 'bracketing' as I read about in a digital photography book. These pictures were just for experimenting. They aren't nice, or pretty, although I was trying to get the moon (white orb over middle of rig, hard to tell apart from the other lights), but that didn't work either.
Here's the underexposed one...
exif info
File size: 22574 bytes
File date: 2006:01:14 22:46:04
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot S70
Date/Time: 2006:01:13 14:56:12
Resolution: 800 x 600
Flash used: No
Focal length: 5.8mm (35mm equivalent: 111mm)
CCD width: 1.88mm
Exposure time: 0.050 s (1/20)
Aperture: f/8.0
Exposure bias: -2.00
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure Mode: Auto bracketing
normal (auto mode) version...
File size: 27912 bytes
File date: 2006:01:14 22:46:03
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot S70
Date/Time: 2006:01:13 14:56:01
Resolution: 800 x 600
Flash used: No
Focal length: 5.8mm (35mm equivalent: 111mm)
CCD width: 1.88mm
Exposure time: 0.200 s (1/5)
Aperture: f/8.0
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
over-exposed version...
File date: 2006:01:14 22:46:05
Camera make: Canon
Camera model: Canon PowerShot S70
Date/Time: 2006:01:13 14:56:25
Resolution: 800 x 600
Flash used: No
Focal length: 5.8mm (35mm equivalent: 111mm)
CCD width: 1.88mm
Exposure time: 0.800 s
Aperture: f/8.0
Exposure bias: 2.00
Whitebalance: Auto
Metering Mode: matrix
Exposure Mode: Auto bracketing
I took all three pictures one right after the other. Not having played with the exposure settings before, I was suprised at the difference it can make.
Say, why the differences in shutter speed? That was done by the camera.