|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 657
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 657 |
I have a couple questions;
What are the advantages/disadvantages of each? Shelf life of each?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,202
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,202 |
I've found T7 to be cleaner then Pyrodex Shelf life will depend on how it's stored, but should be the same for both.
You'll get better results using the powdered versions of wither one
One shot, one kill........ It saves a lot of ammo!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,589 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,589 Likes: 1 |
777 will draw moisture way faster then pyrodex. after finding blackhorn 209 i consider both junk powder.
Last edited by srwshooter; 09/18/14.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,539
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,539 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,735
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,735 |
A comparable charge of 777 has more energy than the same Pyrodex. My order of preference is B209, then 777, after that Pyrodex, all loose powder.
If your gun and regs allow I'd use B209.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,116
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,116 |
I 100 percent agree with. Savage62. Loose 777 is more consitant than pellets and so much cheaper ..........
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 657
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 657 |
Thanks guys. I am finding Blackhorn 209 impossible to find. Everything I have read about it says it's the answer.
|
|
|
|
552 members (1minute, 222Sako, 160user, 06hunter59, 10gaugemag, 10ring1, 69 invisible),
12,839
guests, and
1,079
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,195,369
Posts18,547,172
Members74,060
|
Most Online21,066 May 26th, 2024
|
|
|
|
|